a sustained remission rate 8% lower (OR=0.92) than those with the lower drinking frequency; and rates of sustained remission were ~10 times greater among probands who had received formal AUD treatment by T10 (OR=10.8); the hazard odds ratio for the continuous LR score was difficult to place into the same perspective due to prior standardization and log-transformation of the LR scores. Therefore, the full model from Table 3 was re-run using a dichotomous measure of LR based on a median split of the continuous LR score used in these analyses, revealing that the AUD sustained remission rate among higher LR subjects was 68% less than among lower LR subjects (OR=0.32).
