(5) evoked delta power in the Go condition was higher compared to the NoGo condition at all except frontal regions in controls and all except frontocentral regions in alcoholics, indicating its relative contribution to the activation of a motor response, (6) evoked slow alpha power was higher in the NoGo compared to the Go condition in both groups, Indicating its relative contribution to the suppression of a motor response; however, this difference was significant only in alcoholics at the frontocentral regions, indicating higher resource allocation in these brain regions during inhibition in alcoholics, (7) evoked fast alpha power was higher in the NoGo compared to the Go condition in both groups, but this difference was significant only in controls at posteriotemporal regions, indicating higher resource allocation in these brain regions during inhibition, (8) both groups had their highest evoked delta power at parietal regions for the Go condition and at central regions for the NoGo condition, indicating relative activation of these respective brain regions while executing and inhibiting a motor response, and (9) the control group had their highest evoked
