Expressed in terms of odd ratios, the AUD occurrence among FHP subjects was 48% larger than among FHN subjects (HR=1.48); probands with a 1-drink increase in T1 drinking quantity were diagnosed with an AUD at a 41% higher rate than those with the lower T1 drinking quantity (HR=1.41); and those with a 1-year increase in age of drinking onset were diagnosed with an AUD at a 8% lower rate than those with the earlier age of drinking onset (HR=0.92). The hazard ratio for the continuous LR score was difficult to place into perspective due to prior standardization and log-transformation. Therefore, the full model from Table 2 was re-run using a categorical measure of LR based on a median split of the continuous LR score used in these analyses, revealing that the AUD rate among high LR subjects was 53% smaller than among low LR subjects (HR=0.47).
