Across all predictors except sadness, controlling for INT status in the analyses of change in EXT status had little effect on the findings. However, for sadness, two significant findings dropped to nonsignificance for the IM versus SE contrast (see Table 6). SE status was related to sadness in only one comparison when change in internalizing status was controlled, likely because many SE children also had internalizing problems and their sadness was linked to internalizing problems (note that the unexpected finding that IM versus SE status was predicted by higher sadness became nonsignificant).
