as shown by the squares of the correlation in Table 1, the SRE-based LR explained 16.7% of the variance in predicting T2 drinks, with, as shown in Figure 1, 12.6% explained by the SRE independent of the alcohol challenge LR. At the same time, the percent of the variance of T2 outcome explained by the alcohol challenge overall was 6.8% (from Table 1), with 2.7% independent of the SRE. In other words, 60.3% of the ability of the alcohol-challenge-based LR to predict alcohol outcome overlapped with the SRE, while 24.6% of the ability of the SRE to predict outcome was explained by the alcohol challenge.
