paperKB
coga / coga-kb
Help
Sign in

Chunk #25 — Results — Frontal EEG Asymmetry as a Function of Lifetime DSM-IV-Defined Depression — Follow-up analyses: Current MDD status and depression severity

Source
Resting frontal EEG asymmetry as an endophenotype for depression risk: sex-specific patterns of frontal brain asymmetry.
Embedded
yes

Text

alpha power was again the dependent variable. If EEG asymmetry results represent trait effects that are not due to current depressive symptomatology, a lifetime MDD effect should still emerge. A main effect emerged for BDI-II (F(1, 303) = 11.0, p = .001), indicating that higher BDI-II scores were associated with relatively less left frontal activity (estimated -1 SD on BDI-II: M = .069 and SE = .01 vs. estimated +1 SD on BDI-II: M = .063, SE = .01, d = .05). A main effect also emerged for HRSD (F(1, 303) = 20.2, p < .001), demonstrating that higher HRSD scores were associated with relatively less left frontal activity (estimated -1 SD on HRSD: M = .077 and SE = .01 vs. estimated +1 SD on HRSD: M = .054, SE = .01, d = .21). Most importantly, however, the main effect of lifetime MDD remained significant when entered after BDI-II (F(1, 303) = 12.7, p < .001, d = .50) or HRSD(F(1, 303) = 18.6, p < .001, d = .43), indicating that relationship of lifetime MDD status to CSD–referenced frontal asymmetry could not be accounted for by current levels of depression symptoms.