Because our data also suggest differential trends across age group, we conducted a secondary a post-hoc trend analysis comparing a linear trend to a quadratic trend separately for the ITC no win and win conditions. For the no win condition, the linear contrast was not significant, t(106) = −.397, p = .692, but the quadratic contrast was reliable, t(106) = 2.094, p = .039. Conversely, for the win condition, there was a linear effect, t(106) = −2.650, p = .009, whereas the quadratic contrast was not significant, t(106) = .186, p = .853.
