(p = .001) for SWM. See Table 4. The interaction contrast, (AE+ vs. AE−) vs. (ADHD vs. CON), was significant (p = .001) for SWM. Simple effects showed that there was no significant difference between the AE+ and AE− (p = .582), and that the interaction contrast significant was driven by the difference of ADHD and CON (p < .001; ADHD < CON). There was no significant difference (p = .224) between the combined AE+/− group and ADHD, however the combined AE+/− group performed significantly worse than the CON group (p < .001) for SWM. See Table 5.
