Significant interaction effects between fluid intelligence PGS and nonsexual assaultive trauma were observed for cued no‐go and go theta ERO power such that individuals with lower fluid intelligence PGS and a nonsexual assaultive trauma had lower cued no‐go theta ERO power (B = 0.093, p < 0.01; Table 2) and lower cued go theta ERO power (B = 0.075, p < 0.05; Table 2). Only the interaction effect between the fluid intelligence PGS and nonsexual assaultive trauma on cued no‐go theta ERO power remained after a Bonferroni correction for eight tests (p < 0.00625; Table 2; Figure 1). A simple slopes plot visualizing this significant interaction is shown in Figure 2.
