paperKB
coga / coga-kb
Help
Sign in

Chunk #16 — Discussion

Source
Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant results.
Embedded
yes

Text

effect when they reject the null hypothesis that the population effect is at least small. The results in the latter scenario favored publishing everything even more; on average less than 4 studies were needed in the publishing everything approach, whereas more than 8 publications (114 studies) were needed in the selective publishing approach. On top of statistical arguments, we also demonstrate that publishing everything is more efficient than selective publishing with respect to cost-benefit and time considerations.