Chunk #33 — RESULTS — ERO mean energy and phase locking in HAP-1, LAP-1 and HS/Ibg mice — ERO differences between HAP-1, LAP-1 and HS/Ibg mice: ERO energy and PLI in the 50–350 ms window — ERO Energy
Group × Tone interaction in the delta and alpha/beta bands were not significant in the frontal and parietal cortices. In contrast, significant Group × Tone interaction was found in the theta band in the frontal cortex [F(2.9, 71.5) = 4.1; P = 0.01] (Fig. 6), but not parietal cortex. Post hoc assessment revealed that HAP-1 mice had higher ERO energy than LAP-1 mice in the frontal theta band in response to rare tones [F(2,51) = 3.8; P < 0.05] (Fig. 6). Post hoc analyses revealed that LAP-1 mice had lower ERO energy than HS/Ibg mice in frontal theta band in response to standard [F(2,51) = 3.9; P < 0.05], rare [F(2,51) = 3.8; P < 0.05] and noise [F(2,51) = 3.7; P < 0.05] tones (Fig. 6). Figure 5A–C illustrates grand-averaged ERO time-frequency representations of the rare tones for the theta frequency band.
