paperKB
coga / coga-kb
Help
Sign in

Chunk #73 — Discussion

Source
A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
Embedded
yes

Text

Our integrated exposure–response curve, however, does not address how different sources of particulate matter interact in terms of effects and overlapping exposures. Studies124,159,160 have reported broadly similar effect sizes for ambient particulate matter by smoking status (never, former, and current smokers). Other evidence161 shows that the effects diminish with increasing exposure for active smoking, a pattern incorporated into our exposure– response curves. We applied the effects of ambient particulate matter to both smokers and non-smokers alike to be consistent with the epidemiological evidence that emphasises independent effects of ambient particulate matter. The reasons for the independent effects of different sources of particulate matter should be further investigated. They might include different compositions of particulate matter by source, or different time patterns of exposure162—eg, exposure to particulate matter from active smoking is characterised by episodic, high doses whereas exposure to ambient particulate matter is more constant over time.