paperKB
coga / coga-kb
Help
Sign in

Chunk #58 — Methods — Comparison of GIANT and UK Biobank GWAS results

Source
The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data.
Embedded
yes

Text

For Fig. 4d, e and the credible set analysis we used autosomal markers only, and filtered markers in each data source such that MAF > 0.001 (defined in the GWAS population), and Info score > 0.3 in the UK Biobank imputed data. There were 16,443,622 such markers in UK Biobank imputed data, 703,946 in the UK Biobank genotyped data, and 2,546,872 in GIANT.