Table 2 shows mean raw scores (scaled raw scores for MicroCog) and standard deviations for each NP measure in each NP domain. Reported significance levels for Group, Gender, and Group by Gender effects are based upon raw score comparisons within multivariate analysis of variance. Examination of individual measures indicates that better performance of TNAD in the Attention domain, compared to TNAD, was due to higher scores on MicroCog Numbers Forward (p < .001, partial eta2 = .116) and Numbers Reversed (p < .001, partial eta2 = .116), along with a trend toward better scores in the Stroop Color condition (p = .10). In the Immediate and Delayed Memory domains, TNAD scored higher than NAC on MicroCog Wordlist 2 (p < .05, partial eta2 = 4.0), while there were trends toward better performance of NAC, compared to TNAD, on the Rey-Immediate (p = .06) and -Delayed (p = .08) Recall measures. In the Abstraction/Cognitive Flexibility domain, women scored higher than men on the Stroop-Interference (p < .05, partial eta2 = .046), and MicroCog Analogies (trend - p = .052). In addition,
