Eight audio-recorded segments were randomly selected for coding from the 46 available segments (recordings of two groups were lost due to a technical error). High levels of interrater reliability were demonstrated, with a single-member intraclass correlation coefficient of .84. All segments showed moderate to heavy depth of coverage (score of 3.0 or higher) for one or more ACT processes (average number of ACT processes covered = 2.1; range = 1–4). In correspondence with the manual, all of the segments taken from the first two sessions had high (3+) scores in defusion, acceptance, and workability or their combination, but not for values or action. All of the segments from the third group session all had high (3+) ratings for values, action, or their combination and high ratings for acceptance, but not for workability or defusion. ACT processes scheduled to be regularly targeted during the specific session averaged 3.33, processes not expected to be targeted averaged 1.49, and nonspecific items averaged 1.58 overall. Contraindicated items averaged 1.04, approaching the floor of the scale. Ratings of overall adherence and competence, which raters were
