Significant interaction effects between the fluid intelligence PGS and nonsexual assaultive trauma were observed for cued no‐go and go theta ERO power such that individuals with lower fluid intelligence PGS and a nonsexual assaultive trauma had lower cued no‐go theta ERO power (B = 0.093, p < 0.01; Table 2) and lower cued go theta ERO power (B = 0.075, p < 0.05; Table 2). Only the interaction effect between the fluid intelligence PGS and nonsexual assaultive trauma on cued no‐go theta ERO power remained after a Bonferroni correction for eight tests (p < 0.00625; Table 2; Figure 1).
