paperKB
coga / coga-kb
Processing
Help
Sign in

Chunk #12 — Results — Differences Across Criterion Count–Based AUD Groups

Source
Diagnostic Criteria for Identifying Individuals at High Risk of Progression From Mild or Moderate to Severe Alcohol Use Disorder.
Embedded
yes

Text

As expected, increasing criterion count (ie, single criterion, mild, moderate, and severe AUD) was associated with increasing levels of heavy alcohol use and greater psychiatric comorbidity (Table 1). For instance, 48.9% and 82.4% of individuals with mild-to-moderate and severe AUD, respectively, reported experiencing blackouts. Likewise, 80% of those with severe AUD met criteria for a comorbid SUD vs half of those with mild-to-moderate AUD. Count-based severity was also reflected in reduced P300 amplitude and theta and delta EROs in individuals with severe vs mild-to-moderate AUD. AUD PGS also differentiated between severe and no AUD in the European ancestry subsample (odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.35) and between severe and mild AUD in the African American ancestry subsample (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07-1.51) (eTable 3 in Supplement 1). Individuals with mild AUD differed from those with moderate AUD on alcohol-related and psychiatric variables, but overall differences between these 2 severity groups were less pronounced than those between moderate and severe AUD or between mild-to-moderate and severe AUD. The extent of observed differences between mild and moderate AUD, as opposed to