analysis, M=2.21. The moderation model was re-analyzed with the new cluster analysis subgroupings and forcing the structural parameters to be equal across groups. The fit was good: χ2 (84)=138.79, p<.001, CFI=.98, RMSEA=.05. Model fit was marginally improved by freeing the path coefficient between density and CP, χ2(1)=2.90, p<.10, resulting in model fit of χ2 (83)=135.89, p<.001, CFI=.98, RMSEA=.05. A similar pattern of parenting subgroup differences in associations between density and CP was found: β =.28, p=.001 and β =.11, p=.09 for the less and for the more effective parenting subgroups, respectively. The associations between density and BD were β =.09, p=.06, and β =.10, p=.06, for the same parenting subgroups, respectively. Given the more balanced distribution of participants across subgroups in the original analysis, and therefore more balanced power, we opted to retain the original subgroupings based on the median splits.
