N1 latency did not differ between groups (F1,51=0.042, p=0.839). There was a main effect of Hemisphere (F1,51=62.451, p<0.001), demonstrating that N1 latency was longer at electrodes ipsilateral vs. contralateral to the stimuli (see Fig. 7a). Significant IHTTs were also observed in both the SZ patients (F1,33=28.481, p<0.001) and the HCs (F1,19=13.763, p=0.001) when the groups were considered separately. The Diagnosis × Hemisphere interaction was not significant (F1,51=3.132, p=0.083), indicating that IHTTs did not differ between SZ and HC (see Fig. 7b). In contrast to the P1 results, there was no VF × Hemisphere interaction for the N1 (F1,51=2.342, p=0.132), indicating that the IHTTs for left-to-right transfer did not differ from the IHTTs for right-to-left transfer (see Fig. 7c). Nor was the Diagnosis × VF × Hemisphere interaction significant (F3,153=0.573, p=0.633). There was a main effect of Electrode (F3,153=5.314, p=0.002) but there was no Electrode × Hemisphere interaction (F3,153=0.153, p=0.928). There were no other significant main effects or interactions.
