paperKB
coga / coga-kb
Processing
Help
Sign in

Chunk #31 — Discussion — Study 1: Non-socially anxious participants

Source
Intensified neuronal investment in the processing of chemosensory anxiety signals in non-socially anxious and socially anxious individuals.
Embedded
yes

Text

The processing of axillary odors unequivocally recruited stronger neuronal activity in females than in males. The intense neuronal processing of body odor signals in females was accompanied by a differential response to the two chemosensory stimuli within the P3 latency range. So far, two studies reported females to respond more sensitively than males to chemosensory anxiety signals [13], [20], whereas other studies did not find any gender differences [11], [12], [15]. However, no study described a processing advantage for chemical signals of emotions in male participants. Even though a larger late positivity within the ERP in females has been observed in response to common odors [34] and socially relevant information (facial expressions of emotions; [35]), null effects of gender in emotional stimulus processing have also been reported (odors: [36]; emotional stimuli: [37]). Here, it is postulated that sex effects in the processing of emotional stimuli are most pronounced for social emotional stimuli [38] and most importantly, for emotional stimuli with a weak perceptional salience [39], [40]. In accordance with this assumption, the stimuli administered in the present study were perceived