F-values, effect sizes (d) and p-values were calculated for each ANOVA. These are displayed graphically for ERSP and ITC analyses in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. Following standard procedures, p-values were submitted to FDR, to maintain the overall false discovery rate at p < .05 for ERSP and ITC analyses, respectively. The large numbers of tests preclude a full narrative of the significant effects for each omnibus test. Thus, we present summary effects. By “summary” we mean effects representing the average for selected frequency and time windows based on visual inspection of clusters of statistically significant effects. These are presented in tabular form in Table 3 for ERSP and Table 5 for ITC with repeated measures ANOVAs conducted on each effect. Consequently, in some cases, an interaction emerged at the aggregate level of analysis that was not present in the fine-grained analysis. We acknowledge that we have imposed rectangular shapes on significant effective ranges displayed (Tables 2-5 and Figure 3 and Figure 5). Means and standard errors for summary effects are presented in Table 2 for ERSP and Table 4 for ITC.
