For stimulation effects, the ASQ-Light model and AlcQF model afforded similar prediction, with only very slight evidence in favor of ASQ-Light (ΔAIC = 1.07, evidence ratio = 1.71). However, the AlcQF model was rather strongly preferred over the SRE 3-mo. model (ΔAIC = 9.53, evidence ratio = 118). Compared to the model with AlcQF alone, the model including both AlcQF and ASQ-Light performed decidedly better (ΔAIC = 22.2, evidence ratio = 67,200), as did the SRE 3-mo. model (ΔAIC = 13.7, evidence ratio = 951). The model including both AlcQF and ASQ-Light performed much better compared to an analogous model including AlcQF and SRE 3-mo. (ΔAIC = 8.52, evidence ratio = 71).
