interaction, F(2, 64) = 3.30, p < .05. Follow-up 2 (Prime) × 2 (Target) ANOVAs within each beverage group showed significant Prime × Target interactions in each group (ps < .05). However, inspection of the means associated with this effect (see Figure 3B) shows that participants in the alcohol group showed a particularly robust bias effect (more accurate for guns than tools on black-prime trials; d = 1.57) relative to those in the other groups (ds = 0.96 and 0.72 for control and placebo, respectively). Additionally, the difference in accuracy between black-tool and white-tool trials was larger in the alcohol group (M = −.08) than in the control (M = −.01) and placebo groups (M = −.03).
