paperKB
coga / coga-kb
Help
Sign in

Chunk #48 — 3. Impact of spatial scale on CSD implementations — 3.3. Empirical considerations for planar (two-dimensional) scalp-recorded EEG — 3.3.1. Surface Laplacian applications

Source
Generator localization by current source density (CSD): implications of volume conduction and field closure at intracranial and scalp resolutions.
Embedded
yes

Text

Although the nature and significance of the later components is beyond the scope of this paper, the CSD also offers clear advantages over ERPs for the late, condition-dependent components (i.e., prominent for rare targets requiring a right hand response compared to frequent nontargets). First, the sinks corresponding to N2 (260 ms) and the frontal response-related negativity (FRN; 500 ms) are considerably more prominent and topographically distinct in the CSD waveforms and topographies than are the negativities in either of the reference-dependent ERPs. Second, the well-defined P3 source (360 ms in Fig. 4A) contrasts with the marked differences between nose- and mastoid-referenced ERPs at all locations. Third, the localization and asymmetry of the late response-related components are most distinctive for the CSD (cf. Fz, C3, C4 in Fig. 4A), revealing a robust, persistent negativity over, but not confined to, the left motor cortex (i.e., contralateral to the response hand) and a robust, focal mid-frontal sink at the approximate time of the button press. Furthermore, the response-related, contralateral negativity is superimposed on P3, revealing a characteristic source asymmetry over central sites, that