Task preparation processes related to reward prediction precede those related to task-difficulty expectation.
- Authors
- Schevernels, Hanne; Krebs, Ruth M; Santens, Patrick; Woldorff, Marty G; Boehler, C Nicolas
- Year
- 2014
- Journal
- NeuroImage
- PMID
- 24064071
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.039
- PMCID
- PMC3863725
Recently, attempts have been made to disentangle the neural underpinnings of preparatory processes related to reward and attention. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research showed that neural activity related to the anticipation of reward and to attentional demands invokes neural activity patterns featuring large-scale overlap, along with some differences and interactions. Due to the limited temporal resolution of fMRI, however, the temporal dynamics of these processes remain unclear. Here, we report an event-related potentials (ERP) study in which cued attentional demands and reward prospect were combined in a factorial design. Results showed that reward prediction dominated early cue processing, as well as the early and later parts of the contingent negative variation (CNV) slow-wave ERP component that has been associated with task-preparation processes. Moreover these reward-related electrophysiological effects correlated across participants with response time speeding on reward-prospect trials. In contrast, cued attentional demands affected only the later part of the CNV, with the highest amplitudes following cues predicting high-difficulty potential-reward targets, thus suggesting maximal task preparation when the task requires it and entails reward prospect. Consequently, we suggest that task-preparation processes triggered by reward can arise earlier, and potentially more directly, than strategic top-down aspects of preparation based on attentional demands.
Paradigm. In active-attention trials cues indicated the target location (direction of arrow), availability of reward (color of arrow) and task difficulty (color of fixation square). After a variable ISI a target was presented and participants had to indicate whether the top or bottom gap was larger. Subsequent feedback indicated the amount of money won or lost (4 eurocents for reward trials or 0 eurocents for no-reward trials).
Mid-range cue-related potentials. (A) Grand average ERPs elicited by cues in all four conditions at electrode sites C1, C2, Cz and CPz between 200 and 250 ms, and a topographic map reflecting the difference in P2 amplitude between reward-predicting cues and trials without reward prediction (electrodes of interest are indicated by white markers). (B) Grand average ERPs locked to the onset of the cue at electrode sites P1, P2, PO3, PO4, Pz and POz between 300 and 500 ms, reflecting P3 amplitudes in all conditions, and a topographic plot for reward condition versus no-reward condition.
Contingent negative variation. (A) Electrophysiological waveform indicating the CNV, with an early (700–1100 ms) and late (1100–1500 ms) phase at electrode sites C1, C2 and Cz. (B) Topographic maps resulting from condition-wise contrasts in the early and late time window of the CNV (ME = main effect). (C) Correlation between difficulty effect in the reward condition on the late CNV amplitude and target RTs (high minus low task difficulty, respectively).
Target- and feedback-related potentials. (A) Grand average ERPs indicating target P3 amplitudes at parietal electrode sites P1, P2, Pz and POz between 300 and 600 ms and a topographic map reflecting the average of all four main conditions, with the ROI being indicated by white electrode markers. (B) Electrophysiological waveforms time-locked to the onset of the feedback electrodes CP1, CP2 and CPz (from 200 to 400 ms) and a topographic map averaging the four main conditions.
No entities extracted from this document yet.
No uploaded files.
In this knowledge base
| Title | Year | PMID |
|---|---|---|
| Advances in Electrophysiological Research. | 2015 | 26259089 |
External
| Title | Authors | Journal | Year | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From anticipation to consummatory: Electrophysiological mechanisms of music reward processing in major depressive disorder. | Huang S et al. | — | 2026 | → |
| Neurocognitive Dynamics Underlying Penalty-induced Boosting of Proactive Metacontrol and Its Influence on Reactive Metacontrol. | Kang MS et al. | — | 2026 | → |
| The role of attention in the generation of anticipatory potentials to affective stimuli: an ERP and source analysis study. | Benzaquén E et al. | — | 2026 | → |
| Brace yourself: neural and computational insights into the experience of mental effort. | Corlazzoli G et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| Differences in Consummatory but Not Anticipatory Reward Processing Predict Depressive Symptoms in Young Adult Women. | Lees T et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| Effort Expenditure Reduces Prosocial Decision-Making: Computational Principles and Neural Mechanisms. | Zhang Y et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| On the temporal dynamics of reward utilization in dual-task situations. | Langsdorf LE et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| Reward and Efficacy Modulate the Rate of Anticipatory Pupil Dilation. | Eayrs JO et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| Task-irrelevant abrupt onsets differentially impact value-related orienting and maintenance. | Chak C et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| The Cost of Regulating Effort: Reward and Difficulty Cues With Longer Prediction Horizons Have a Stronger Impact on Performance. | Kukkonen N et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| The influence of punishment anticipation on inhibitory control processing in individuals with test anxiety. | Ou Y et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| The neuroscientific basis of flow: Learning progress guides task engagement and cognitive control. | Lu H et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| Early and late contingent negative variation (CNV) reflect different aspects of deficits in schizophrenia. | Akgül Ö et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| EEG components of inhibitory control ability in internet gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. | Yu J et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Effort discounts reward-based control allocation: A neurodynamic perspective. | Zheng Y et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Frontal midline theta power during the cue-target-interval reflects increased cognitive effort in rewarded task-switching. | Arnau S et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Mind the instructions: Reward cues are liked first, wanted later. | Prutean N et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Muscarinic receptors mediate motivation via preparatory neural activity in humans. | Grogan JP et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Neural and Computational Mechanisms of Motivation and Decision-making. | Yee DM | — | 2024 | → |
| The effect of performance contingent reward prospects flexibly adapts to more versus less specific task goals. | Liegel N et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| A systematic exploration of attentional load effects on the C1 ERP component. | Qin N et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Comparing monetary gain and loss in the monetary incentive delay task: EEG evidence. | Zhang Y et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Integrated effects of top-down attention and statistical learning during visual search: An EEG study. | Dolci C et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Learning when effort matters: neural dynamics underlying updating and adaptation to changes in performance efficacy. | Grahek I et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Mothers exhibit higher neural activity in gaining rewards for their children than for themselves. | Zhang Y et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Reward advantage over punishment for incentivizing visual working memory. | Sun Y et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| An EEG study of the combined effects of top-down and bottom-up attentional selection under varying task difficulty. | Rashal E et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance. | Rong Y et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Filling the gaps: Cognitive control as a critical lens for understanding mechanisms of value-based decision-making. | Frömer R et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Guiding spatial attention by multimodal reward cues. | Hoofs V et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Neural dynamics of effort-modulated reward processing. | Zhang M et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Neural Dynamics Underlying Cognitive Control Modulated by Reinforcement Learning of Irrelevant Stimulus-Response Associations. | Zhang D et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Task prioritization modulates alpha, theta and beta EEG dynamics reflecting proactive cognitive control. | Liegel N et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| The ERP correlates of color-based center-surround inhibition in working memory. | Shi R et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| The Neural and Psychological Processes of Peer-Influenced Online Donation Decision: An Event-Related Potential Study. | Ye Y et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Behavioral and electrocortical effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation during advice-guided decision-making. | Wischnewski M et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Caffeine Boosts Preparatory Attention for Reward-related Stimulus Information. | van den Berg B et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Differences in Mechanical Parameters of Keyboard Switches Modulate Motor Preparation: A Wearable EEG Study. | Watanabe H et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Dynamic interplay between reward and voluntary attention determines stimulus processing in visual cortex | Grahek I et al. | — | 2021 | — |
| Dynamic Interplay between Reward and Voluntary Attention Determines Stimulus Processing in Visual Cortex. | Grahek I et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Expectations of reward and efficacy guide cognitive control allocation. | Frömer R et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Investigating anticipatory processes during sequentially changing reward prospect: An ERP study. | Fröber K et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Investigating limits of task prioritization in dual-tasking: evidence from the prioritized processing and the psychological refractory period paradigms. | Rieger T et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Limited Evidence of Associations Between Executive Functioning and Alcohol Involvement In UK Adolescents. | Burton S et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Neural Mechanisms of Reward-by-Cueing Interactions: ERP Evidence. | Li X et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| The interactive effects of reward expectation and emotional interference on cognitive conflict control: An ERP study. | Jia Y et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Are all behavioral reward benefits created equally? An EEG-fMRI study. | Kostandyan M et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Differential Effects of Monetary and Social Rewards on Product Online Rating Decisions in E-Commerce in China. | Wang C et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Dysfunctional cognitive control and reward processing in adolescents with Internet gaming disorder. | Li Q et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| EEG correlates of physical effort and reward processing during reinforcement learning. | Palidis DJ et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Expecting the good: Symbolic valence signals provoke action biases and undermine goal-directed behavior. | Hoofs V et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Rat Paraventricular Neurons Encode Predictive and Incentive Information of Reward Cues. | Munkhzaya U et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Aberrant reward dynamics in trait anticipatory anhedonia. | Zhou S et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Contingent negative variation during a modified cueing task in simulated driving. | Guo Z et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Differential effects of sustained and transient effort triggered by reward - A combined EEG and pupillometry study. | Kostandyan M et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Differential modulations of reward expectation on implicit facial emotion processing: ERP evidence. | Wu L et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Electrophysiological correlates of prediction formation in anticipation of reward- and punishment-related feedback signals. | Wischnewski M et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Expectation Gates Neural Facilitation of Emotional Words in Early Visual Areas. | Trauer SM et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| I feel what I do: Relating interoceptive processes and reward-related behavior. | Marshall AC et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Preparing for hard times: Scalp and intracranial physiological signatures of proactive cognitive control. | De Loof E et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Shifts in attentional scope modulate event-related potentials evoked by reward. | Nadig A et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Task-specific prioritization of reward and effort information: Novel insights from behavior and computational modeling. | Vassena E et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Temporal dynamics of hedonic and eudaimonic reward processing: An event-related potentials (ERPs) study. | Luo Y et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Trait anxiety on effort allocation to monetary incentives: a behavioral and high-density EEG study. | Berchio C et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing. | Glazer JE et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Dissociating absolute and relative reward- and punishment-related electrocortical processing: An event-related potential study. | Wischnewski M et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Monetary Reward and Punishment to Response Inhibition Modulate Activation and Synchronization Within the Inhibitory Brain Network. | Chikara RK et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Spatiotemporal dynamics of reward and punishment effects induced by associative learning. | Wang H et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Task switching in autism: An EEG study on intentions and actions. | Hoofs V et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| The relationship between responsiveness to social and monetary rewards and ADHD symptoms. | Sutcubasi B et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Transient and sustained incentive effects on electrophysiological indices of cognitive control in younger and older adults. | Williams RS et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Consciously over Unconsciously Perceived Rewards Facilitate Self-face Processing: An ERP Study. | Zhan Y et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Effort provides its own reward: endeavors reinforce subjective expectation and evaluation of task performance. | Wang L et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Independent effects of motivation and spatial attention in the human visual cortex. | Bayer M et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Temporal dynamics of reward anticipation in the human brain. | Zhang Y et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Face-induced expectancies influence neural mechanisms of performance monitoring. | Osinsky R et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Preparing for (valenced) action: The role of differential effort in the orthogonalized go/no-go task. | Schevernels H et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Reward anticipation and trait anhedonia: An electrophysiological investigation in subjects with schizophrenia. | Vignapiano A et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Reward expectation regulates brain responses to task-relevant and task-irrelevant emotional words: ERP evidence. | Wei P et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Reward favors the prepared: Incentive and task-informative cues interact to enhance attentional control. | Chiew KS et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Reward Promotes Self-Face Processing: An Event-Related Potential Study. | Zhan Y et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| The time course of cognitive control implementation. | Janssens C et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Advances in Electrophysiological Research. | Kamarajan C et al. | — | 2015 | → |
| Electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of proactive and reactive control in a rewarded stop-signal task. | Schevernels H et al. | — | 2015 | → |
| Goal-directed EEG activity evoked by discriminative stimuli in reinforcement learning. | Luque D et al. | — | 2015 | → |
| Independent effects of reward expectation and spatial orientation on the processing of emotional facial expressions. | Kang G et al. | — | 2015 | → |
| Preparatory postural adjustments during gait initiation in healthy younger and older adults: Neurophysiological and biomechanical aspects. | Khanmohammadi R et al. | — | 2015 | → |
| Reward-prospect interacts with trial-by-trial preparation for potential distraction. | Marini F et al. | — | 2015 | → |
| Electrophysiological aberrations associated with negative symptoms in schizophrenia. | Boutros NN et al. | — | 2014 | → |
| Reward contingencies and the recalibration of task monitoring and reward systems: a high-density electrical mapping study. | Morie KP et al. | — | 2014 | → |
| The neural response to maternal stimuli: an ERP study. | Wu L et al. | — | 2014 | → |
| Utilization of reward-prospect enhances preparatory attention and reduces stimulus conflict. | van den Berg B et al. | — | 2014 | → |