Chunk #37 — Results — Between-group differences in efficient connectivity in data set 1 — Correlation between the mean EC strength and behavioral measures in data set 2
between the mean EC strength and addiction severity (AUDIT and MAST scores) was still evident after controlling for patient’s the FTND scores. Detailed information is shown in Table 8.Table 7Correlation between EC strength and severity of alcohol dependence in data set 2.Model parametersAddiction severityrPFDR, PLeft pre-SMA → Left pre-SMAAUDIT−0.2920.0890.098MAST−0.3340.0500.063Left pre-SMA → Right putamenAUDIT−0.4680.0050.008MAST−0.562<0.001<0.001Right dACC → Right putamenAUDIT−0.556<0.001<0.001MAST−0.557<0.001<0.001Right LOFC → Right NACCAUDIT−0.2840.0980.098MAST−0.3490.0400.057Right NACC → Left pre-SMAAUDIT0.4680.0050.008MAST0.577<0.001<0.001Table 8Correlation between EC strength and severity of alcohol dependence after controlling for patient’s FTND scores in data set 2.Model parametersAddiction severityrPFDR, PLeft pre-SMA → Left pre-SMAAUDIT−0.2890.0980.108MAST−0.3240.0620.078Left pre-SMA → Right putamenAUDIT−0.4660.0050.008MAST−0.568<0.001<0.001Right dACC → Right putamenAUDIT−0.559<0.001<0.001MAST−0.545<0.001<0.001Right LOFC → Right NACCAUDIT−0.2810.1080.108MAST−0.3390.0500.070Right NACC → Left pre-SMAAUDIT0.4760.0040.008MAST0.552<0.001<0.001
