Additionally, our impulsivity assessment failed to resolve the multidimensionality of this broad construct and so this project could not address as to whether specific differences in impulsivity development occur depending on the facet utilized for study. Notably, when correlated (in a separate sample) with the recently identified five facets of impulsivity (see Cyders et al., 2007; Whiteside and Lynam, 2001), our impulsivity measure correlated strongest (r = 0.56, p < 0.0001) with the (lack of) premediation subscale.
