MANOVAs on each of the EROEVK log-transformed power measures are shown in Table 3. Only δ1 EROEVK power (F(5,90) = 3.098, p = .013) discriminated the groups. LTAAs had lower δ1 EROEVK power than NACs at Pz, CPz and Cz, with group accounting for 9.9%, 6.3% and 4.8% of the variance respectively. Discriminant analysis confirmed the contribution δ1 EROEVK power at Pz, but indicated only δ1 EROEVK power at Pz and FCz made independent contributions to group discrimination.
