activity to gain feedback corresponded to an enhanced positivity at both FN and P3, while enhanced theta activity for losses produced opposite effects at FN (increased negative amplitude) and P3 (increased positive amplitude). Together theta and delta combined additively at FN to create a large gain-loss difference, but in a subtractive manner at P3 resulting in a non-significant gain-loss difference (Bernat et al., 2011). A primary goal of the current study is to assess these theta phase and amplitude dynamics in relation to data from a go/no-go task in order to evaluate whether these dynamics may contribute to the commonly assessed N2 and P3 components, as was found for the FN and P3 components. Such effects could have implications for understanding how theta and delta contribute to ERPs more broadly, and provide an assessment of separable theta and delta functional processes during response inhibition.
