paperKB
coga / coga-kb
Help
Sign in

Chunk #31 — Methods

Source
Guidelines for Evaluating the Comparability of Down-Sampled GWAS Summary Statistics.
Embedded
yes

Text

We compared the explanatory power of the EXT-minus-23andMe PGSs with the one reported in the original study from analyses of a phenotypic externalizing factor, followed by a set of outcomes related to, or affected by, externalizing behaviors and disorders (e.g., smoking initiation, substance-use disorders, or childhood developmental disorders) (Table S6). Linear regression was applied to continuous outcomes and logistic regression to dichotomous outcomes. We evaluated the incremental R2/pseudo-R2 by subtracting the variance explained by a baseline model with only covariates (age, sex, and the first ten genetic principal components) from the variance explained by a model with the covariates and PGS. Confidence intervals were estimated with the percentile bootstrap method (1000 iterations). We then evaluated whether the coefficient estimates of the down-sampled EXT-minus-23andMe PGSs were comparable to the estimates of the PGS of EXT from the original paper.