paperKB
coga / coga-kb
Help
Sign in

Chunk #21 — Method — Overview of Assessments — Clinical Assessments

Source
The enrichment study of the Minnesota twin family study: increasing the yield of twin families at high risk for externalizing psychopathology.
Embedded
yes

Text

Following the assessment, each interview is reviewed by two individuals with advanced clinical training (supervised by a Ph.D. clinical psychologist) blind to other family diagnoses. Symptom presence is determined through review of severity and frequency criteria for each behavior followed by consensus regarding whether it constitutes a symptom. A symptom is considered present if either the primary caretaker or twin reported it as present, using a best-estimate procedure (Leckman et al., 1982) that we have found results in greater validity than relying on either report alone (Burt et al., 2001). To maximize sensitivity in our population-based sample of adolescents, diagnoses in the twins are made at two levels: definite (all diagnostic criteria satisfied) and probable (all but one diagnostic criteria satisfied). This strategy avoids problems with underreporting of lifetime symptoms in population-based samples (Iacono et al., 1999), and is essential for detecting emerging substance use disorders during adolescence (Martin & Winters, 1998; Pollock & Martin, 1999). Further, it does not appear to inflate our rates of ADHD and CD (Elkins et al., 2007). For example, our DSM-IV lifetime prevalence of