paperKB
coga / coga-kb
Help
Sign in

Chunk #5 — RESULTS — GWAS meta-analysis

Source
Trans-ancestry genome-wide study of depression identifies 697 associations implicating cell types and pharmacotherapies.
Embedded
yes

Text

In order to carry out downstream analyses, including heritability, gene prioritization, enrichment, and genetic correlation, we performed a fixed-effects meta-analysis for samples of European ancestries (525,197 cases and 3,362,335 controls), using a large single linkage disequilibrium (LD) reference dataset. The consequences of MD phenotyping on the meta-analyses were examined using genomic structural equation modeling (SEM) with a common-factor meta-analysis of the European ancestry summary statistics in genomic SEM13 (Figure S1). Cohorts were first meta-analyzed based on how the MD phenotype was determined: clinical/interview, electronic health record [EHR], questionnaire, or self-report of MD diagnosis. The proportion of total effective sample size contributed by each phenotype definition was 4% clinical/interview, 54% EHR, 14% questionnaire, and 27% self-report. The different phenotype definitions of MD had strong genetic correlations (LD score rg from 0.78 to 0.88). We fitted a common-factor model in genomic SEM and set the clinical/interview phenotype as the primary phenotype by fixing its factor loading to 1 and its residual variance to 0. This factor model was consistent with the data (χ32=4.49, p = 0.213); therefore, we could not reject the