paperKB
coga / coga-kb
Processing
Help
Sign in

Chunk #56 — Methods — Bias adjustment

Source
Adjustment for index event bias in genome-wide association studies of subsequent events.
Embedded
yes

Text

As noted in the Results, we may argue that \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$b = \frac{{ - var(U)\beta _{UX}\beta _{UY}}}{{var\left( U \right)\beta _{UX}^2 + var(E_X)}}$$\end{document}b=-var(U)βUXβUYvarUβUX2+var(EX) is approximately constant across SNPs and may be estimated by the linear regression of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\beta _{GY}^\prime$$\end{document}βGY′ on βGX across many SNPs. In a finite sample, this yields an estimate \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hat b^ \ast$$\end{document}b^* that is biased towards 0 by sampling error in \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hat \beta _{GX}$$\end{document}β^GX. We suggest two approaches to adjust for this regression dilution bias. Firstly, following a common approach to the problem28, we can obtain a bias-reduced estimate as \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hat b = \hat b^ \ast \frac{{var(\hat \beta _{GX})}}{{var(\beta _{GX})}}$$\end{document}b^=b^*var(β^GX)var(βGX). In the numerator \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$var(\hat \beta _{GX})$$\end{document}var(β^GX) can be immediately estimated from the data, whereas estimation of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}