Finally, because these stimulation differences appeared unique relative to the effects reported for FH comparisons, we tested whether comparison type moderated stimulation differences when aggregating samples across FH and typical consumption comparisons. As expected, across the ascending and descending limbs of the BAC curve, the stimulation difference in typical consumption comparisons was significantly greater than the stimulation difference in FH comparisons, Qbetween(1) = 8.18, p = .004. Further, when examined separately, stimulation differences in typical consumption comparisons were significantly greater than differences in FH comparisons on both the ascending and descending limbs, Qbetween(1) = 6.60, p = .01, and Qbetween(1) = 5.16, p = .02, respectively.
