paperKB
coga / coga-kb
Processing
Help
Sign in

Chunk #30 — Methods — Theoretical-minimum-risk exposure distributions for counterfactual comparison

Source
A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
Embedded
yes

Text

For some risk factors, new evidence has resulted in a revision of the theoretical-minimum-risk exposure distribution compared to the previous comparative risk assessment. For example, the previous distribution for systolic blood pressure was a mean of 115 mm Hg (SD 6).6 However, subsequent randomised trials154 of blood pressure-lowering medication suggest that the benefits of lowering blood pressure could continue to 110 mm Hg or lower. On this basis, we changed the theoretical-minimum-risk exposure distribution to a mean of 110–115 mm Hg (SD 6). For other exposures, the distribution was increased because of data from new epidemiological studies75— eg, for mean body-mass index we used 21–23 kg/m2, compared with 21 kg/m2 used previously.