An effect of valence was found on RT (avoid loss>win; F1,68=9.5, p=0.003) and amount ($0.20>$5; F1,68=4.6, p=0.036), but interaction between valence and amount did not meet significance (p=0.068). There were no main effects of group or interactions between group and valence or amount (p’s>0.17). There was a group x valence x amount interaction (F1,68=6.7, p=0.012) which was driven by faster RTs for $5 versus $0.20 win for FH− subjects that was not seen in FH+ subjects (p=0.009). Further group analyses controlled for RT. Table 2 presents a summary of task performance.
