Community leaders' perspectives on engaging African Americans in biobanks and other human genetics initiatives.
- Authors
- Buseh, Aaron G; Stevens, Patricia E; Millon-Underwood, Sandra; Townsend, Leolia; Kelber, Sheryl T
- Year
- 2013
- Journal
- Journal of community genetics
- PMID
- 23813337
- DOI
- 10.1007/s12687-013-0155-z
- PMCID
- PMC3773318
There is limited information about what African Americans think about biobanks and the ethical questions surrounding them. Likewise, there is a gap in capacity to successfully enroll African Americans as biobank donors. The purposes of this community-based participatory study were to: (a) explore African Americans' perspectives on genetics/genomic research, (b) understand facilitators and barriers to participation in such studies, and (c) enlist their ideas about how to attract and sustain engagement of African Americans in genetics initiatives. As the first phase in a mixed methods study, we conducted four focus groups with 21 African American community leaders in one US Midwest city. The sample consisted of executive directors of community organizations and prominent community activists. Data were analyzed thematically. Skepticism about biomedical research and lack of trust characterized discussions about biomedical research and biobanks. The Tuskegee Untreated Syphilis Study and the Henrietta Lacks case influenced their desire to protect their community from harm and exploitation. Connections between genetics and family history made genetics/genomics research personal, pitting intrusion into private affairs against solutions. Participants also expressed concerns about ethical issues involved in genomics research, calling attention to how research had previously been conducted in their community. Participants hoped personalized medicine might bring health benefits to their people and proposed African American communities have a "seat at the table." They called for basic respect, authentic collaboration, bidirectional education, transparency and prerogative, and meaningful benefits and remuneration. Key to building trust and overcoming African Americans' trepidation and resistance to participation in biobanks are early and persistent engagement with the community, partnerships with community stakeholders to map research priorities, ethical conduct of research, and a guarantee of equitable distribution of benefits from genomics discoveries.
No figures extracted from this document.
No chunks — full text not yet ingested.
No entities extracted from this document yet.
No uploaded files.
No citations found.
In this knowledge base
External
| Title | Authors | Journal | Year | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient, parent and provider perspectives on sickle cell disease genetics research in Jamaica. | Jones K et al. | — | 2026 | → |
| Community Collaboration in Public Health Genetic Literacy: Methods for Co-Designing Educational Resources for Equitable Genomics Research and Practice. | Salunke J et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| Equitable inclusion of racialised communities in genomic research: a scoping review. | Valiani A et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| Community Collaboration in Public Health Genetic Literacy: Co-Designing Educational Resources for Equitable Genomics Research and Practice | Salunke J et al. | — | 2024 | — |
| The ethical challenges of diversifying genomic data: A qualitative evidence synthesis. | Hardcastle F et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Why and how to collect representative study samples in educational neuroscience research. | Marzoratti A et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Racial disparity in the genomics of precision oncology of prostate cancer. | Le T et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Adapting a conceptual framework to engage diverse stakeholders in genomic/precision medicine research. | Watson KS et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Addressing diversity and inclusion challenges in global neuro-psychiatric and behavioral genomics research. | Matshabane OP et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Development and Validation of the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness Scale to Measure Trust Among Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups in Biomedical Research in the US. | Stallings SC et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Germline Mutations in African American Men With Prostate Cancer: Incidence, Implications and Diagnostic Disparities. | Bree KK et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| The Promoting Equity in Stem Cell Genomics Survey. | Fakunle ES et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Under-Represented Populations Left Out of Alzheimer's Disease Treatment with Aducanumab: Commentary on Ethics. | Padala SP et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Engagement and return of results preferences among a primarily African American genomic sequencing research cohort. | Lewis KL et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Hmong participants' reactions to return of individual and community pharmacogenetic research results: "A positive light for our community". | Holzer K et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Scanning the human genome for "signatures" of positive selection: Transformative opportunities and ethical obligations. | Hernandez M et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Attitudes and experiences regarding genetic research among persons of African descent. | Scott DM et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Community health advisors assessing adherence to national cancer screening guidelines among African Americans in South Los Angeles. | Maxwell AE et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Exploring African American community perspectives about genomic medicine research: A literature review. | Hendricks-Sturrup RM et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Why African Americans say "No": A Study of Pharmacogenomic Research Participation. | Nooruddin M et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| A Review of African Americans' Beliefs and Attitudes About Genomic Studies: Opportunities for Message Design. | Scherr CL et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research. | Kraft SA et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Bridging the Data Gap in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment to Enable Widespread Clinical Implementation across the Multiethnic Landscape of the US. | Spaeth E et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Linking Education to Action: A Program to Increase Research Participation Among African American Women. | Radecki Breitkopf C et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Sistas Taking a Stand for Breast Cancer Research (STAR) Study: A Community-Based Participatory Genetic Research Study to Enhance Participation and Breast Cancer Equity among African American Women in Memphis, TN. | Smith A et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| African American Women's Perspectives on Donating Healthy Breast Tissue for Research: Implications for Recruitment. | Ridley-Merriweather KE et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Learning from Latino voices: Focus Groups' Insights on Participation in Genetic Research. | Martinez P et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Leaves imitate trees: Minnesota Hmong concepts of heredity and applications to genomics research. | Culhane-Pera KA et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Review: Genetic research on alcohol use outcomes in African American populations: A review of the literature, associated challenges, and implications. | Dick DM et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Towards a more representative morphology: clinical and ethical considerations for including diverse populations in diagnostic genetic atlases. | Koretzky M et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Genome-wide association studies in Africans and African Americans: expanding the framework of the genomics of human traits and disease. | Peprah E et al. | — | 2015 | → |
| Enhancing the participation of african americans in health-related genetic research: findings of a collaborative academic and community-based research study. | Millon Underwood S et al. | — | 2013 | → |