Addiction associated N40D mu-opioid receptor variant modulates synaptic function in human neurons.
- Authors
- Halikere, Apoorva; Popova, Dina; Scarnati, Matthew S; Hamod, Aula; Swerdel, Mavis R; Moore, Jennifer C; Tischfield, Jay A; Hart, Ronald P; Pang, Zhiping P
- Year
- 2020
- Journal
- Molecular psychiatry
- PMID
- 31481756
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41380-019-0507-0
- PMCID
- PMC7051890
The OPRM1 A118G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP rs1799971) gene variant encoding the N40D Β΅-opioid receptor (MOR) has been associated with dependence on opiates and other drugs of abuse but its mechanism is unknown. The frequency of G-allele carriers is ~40% in Asians, ~16% in Europeans, and ~3% in African-Americans. With opioid abuse-related deaths rising at unprecedented rates, understanding these mechanisms may provide a path to therapy. Here we generated homozygous N40D subject-specific induced inhibitory neuronal cells (iNs) from seven human-induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell lines from subjects of European descent (both male and female) and probed the impact of N40D MOR regulation on synaptic transmission. We found that D40 iNs exhibit consistently stronger suppression (versus N40) of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) across multiple subjects. To mitigate the confounding effects of background genetic variation on neuronal function, the regulatory effects of MORs on synaptic transmission were recapitulated in two sets of independently engineered isogenic N40D iNs. In addition, we employed biochemical analysis and observed differential N-linked glycosylation of human MOR N40D. This study identifies neurophysiological and molecular differences between human MOR variants that may predict altered opioid responsivity and/or dependence in this subset of individuals.
MOR N40D expressing inhibitory human neurons exhibit more robust suppression of inhibitory synaptic transmission by DAMGO.(A) Oct4 (green), Tra 1-60 (red), and DAPI (blue) ICC for N40 and D40 subject iPS cells depicting pluripotency (B) Sequencing confirming homozygous A118 or G118 genotype of human iPS cell lines (C) MAP2 (green) and Synapsin (red) ICC of iN cells generated from N40 and D40 subject iPS cells (D) MAP2 (green) and VGAT (red) ICC of induced inhibitory neuronal (iN) cells generated from N40 and D40 subject iPS cells (E-G) Both N40 and D40 iN cells exhibit PTX sensitive spontaneous IPSCs whose frequency (N40 vs D40: N.S.) and amplitude (N40 vs D40: N.S.) are unaffected by MOR N40D substitution (H) Representative traces of action potentials induced by step current injections (from β20 to +75 pA, 5 pA increments) during current clamp recordings from one N40 and D40 cell line (I) Quantification of induced action potentials in inhibitory iNs cells illustrating that neuronal excitability is unchanged as a consequence of MOR N40D (N40 vs D40: N.S. at all current injections) (J) Representative traces of sIPSCs recorded to increasing concentrations of DAMGO in N40 and D40 iN cells (K) Quantification of inhibition of sIPSC frequency in individual subject derived N40 and D40 iN cells (L) Merged data of the four N40 and three D40 subject lines illustrates that D40 iN cells exhibit stronger suppression of IPSC frequency compared to N40 iN cells (M-N) sIPSC frequency response to a single concentration of 10 ΒΌM DAMGO; data is normalized to control (N40 vs control: p<0.001, D40 vs control: p<0.001). Summary graphs are shown as individual cell lines or merged data of either four N40 patients (red bars) and three D40 patients (blue bars) (N40 vs D40: p <0.01). Data are depicted as means Β± SEM. Numbers of cells/Number of independently generated cultures analyzed are depicted in bars. Paired t-test was used to evaluate within genotype statistical differences and one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate between genotype statistical differences (*p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001).
Human neurons from two sets of independently targeted isogenic human stem cell lines for OPRM1 A118G validate differential DAMGO response observed in patient cell lines.(A) OPRM1 Targeting Strategy 1: Structure of OPRM1 gene on chromosome 6 and schematic overview of CRISPR/Cas9 gene targeting strategy to knock-in homozygous G118 alleles into human H1 embryonic stem cell (H1ES) in which sgRNA targets donor strand. In the 140bp ssODN, we inserted a T to C mutation to incorporate OPRM1 GG118, synonymous G to A for PAM mutation, and synonymous G to C and G to A mutations to create a BamHI restriction enzyme site. (B) Sequencing of original H1ES control cell line carrying homozygous A118 (N40) alleles, and two isolated clones carrying homozygous OPRM1 G118 (D40) alleles (Clone 9-2-17, Clone 9-2-18). (C) OPRM1 Targeting Strategy 2: Structure of OPRM1 gene on chromosome 6 and an independent CRISPR/Cas9 gene targeting strategy to correct 03SF patient line (originally homozygous G118 expressing MOR D40) to homozygous A118 (N40). We designed a 200 nt template strand to knock-in homozygous A118 alleles, containing mutations to generate a HpaI restriction enzyme site for screening (D) Sequencing of passage-matched, uncorrected 03SF patient cell line carrying homozygous D40 alleles (C12) and two gene-corrected clones (Clone A10, D11) carrying homozygous OPRM1 A118 (N40) alleles after subcloning. (E) ICC of MAP2 (green) and Synapsin (red) of iN cells produced from gene-targeted ES cells and iPS cells. (F) Immunofluorescence of MAP2 (green) and VGAT (red) of iN cells produced from gene-targeted ES cells and iPS cells. (G-I) Relative mRNA levels of OPRM1 as well as markers for inhibitory subtype specificity (GAD1, VGAT) measured by quantitative RT-PCR; mRNA levels are normalized to Synapsin I. Data are represented as means of three independently differentiated batches of iNs from each patient iPS cell line. (J) Representative traces of sIPSCs recorded to increasing concentrations of DAMGO in N40 and D40 iN isogenic iN cells derived from ES cells. (K-L) Quantification of sIPSC frequency (H1 vs control: p <0.05, Clone 17 vs control: p <0.001, Clone 18 vs control: p <0.001, N40 vs control: p <0.05, D40 vs control: p <0.001, N40 vs D40: p <0.05) and amplitude in response to 6 ΒΌM DAMGO (H1 vs control: N.S., Clone 17 vs control: N.S., Clone 18 vs control: N.S., N40 vs control: N.S., D40 vs. control: N.S., N40 vs D40: N.S.) (M) Representative traces of sIPSCs recorded to increasing concentrations of DAMGO in N40 and D40 iN isogenic iN cells derived from iPS cells. (N-O) Quantification of sIPSC frequency (A10: DAMGO vs control: p <0.01, D11: DAMGO vs control: N.S., C12: DAMGO vs control: p <0.001, N40: DAMGO vs control: p <0.01, D40: DAMGO vs control: p <0.001, N40 vs D40: p <0.05) and amplitude in response to 6 ΒΌM DAMGO (A10: DAMGO vs control: N.S., D11: DAMGO vs control: N.S., C12: DAMGO vs control: N.S., N40: DAMGO vs control: N.S., D40: DAMGO vs. control: N.S., N40 vs D40: N.S.). Data are depicted as means Β± SEM. Numbers of cells/Number of independently generated cultures analyzed are depicted in bars. Paired t-test was used to evaluate within genotype statistical differences and one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate between genotype statistical differences (*p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001).
D40 iN cells exhibit greater inhibition of synaptic release and intrinsic excitability.(A) Representative traces of mIPSCs in one N40 (A10) and one D40 (C12) cell line derived iN cells recorded at a 0 mV holding potential and their response to DAMGO. (B-C) Quantification of mIPSC frequency (A10: DAMGO vs control p <0.01, C12: DAMGO vs control p <0.001) and amplitude (A10 and C12: DAMGO vs control p >0.05) in A10 and C12 iN cells normalized to before DAMGO application. (DAMGO effect on frequency: A10 vs C12: p < 0.05, DAMGO effect on amplitude: A10 vs C12: N.S.) (D) Representative traces of evoked IPSCs from one N40 (A10) and one D40 (C12) cell line derived iN cells (E) Quantification of evoked IPSC amplitude in A10 and C12 iN cells normalized to before DAMGO application (A10: DAMGO vs control p <0.05, C12: DAMGO vs control p <0.001, A10 vs C12: p <0.001). Data are depicted as means Β± SEM. Numbers of cells/Number of independently generated cultures analyzed are depicted in bars. Paired t-test was used to evaluate within genotype statistical differences and one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate between genotype statistical differences (*p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001).
D40 iN cells exhibit a sustained decrease in intrinsic excitability.(A) Representative traces of repetitive action potentials generated from depolarizing current injections in one N40 (A10) cell line derived iN and one D40 (C12) cell line derived iN, and their response to DAMGO (B-D) Summary graphs of DAMGO effect on AP Number (A10: DAMGO vs control: N.S., C12: DAMGO vs control p <0.001), amplitude (A10: DAMGO vs control p <0.01, C12: DAMGO vs control p <0.001) and firing threshold (A10: DAMGO vs control: N.S., C12: DAMGO vs control: N.S.). Data normalized to before DAMGO application reveals DAMGO preferentially decreases intrinsic excitability of D40 iNs but not N40 iNs (DAMGO effect on frequency: A10 vs C12 p <0.01) with no effect on amplitude (A10 vs C12: N.S.) or firing threshold (A10 vs C12: N.S.) (E) Representative traces depicting the effect of DAMGO on spontaneous action potential firing in one D40 (C12) and one N40 (A10) cell line derived iN (F) Quantification of number of spontaneous action potentials fired before and after DAMGO application in N40 and D40 iNs represented as a time course (G) Quantification of resting membrane potential before and after DAMGO application in N40 and D40 iNs represented as a time course (H) Representative traces of individual Action Potentials before and after DAMGO in N40 and D40 iN cells (J-K) Summary graphs depicting that DAMGO causes a trending increase in the after hyperpolarization potential (AHP) amplitude in D40 iN cells compared to N40 iN cells (A10: DAMGO vs control: N.S., C12: DAMGO vs control: p <0.05, A10 vs C12: N.S.) with no effect on firing threshold (A10: DAMGO vs control: N.S., C12: DAMGO vs control: N.S., A10 vs C12: N.S.) or half width (A10: DAMGO vs control: N.S., C12: DAMGO vs control: N.S., A10 vs C12: N.S.). Data are depicted as means Β± SEM. Numbers of cells/Number of independently generated cultures analyzed are depicted in bars. Paired t-test was used to evaluate within genotype statistical differences and one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate between genotype statistical differences (*p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001).
Differential N-glycosylation of human MOR carrying N40D variants.(A) Immunoblot (IB) of recombinant human FLAG-MOR N-terminal region-human Fc (amino acids 1-67) expressed as a soluble entity in HEK 293 cells. Both peptides (N40 and D40) were separated by size on an SDS-PAGE gel and detection was accomplished using an anti-FLAG antibody. Note that the untreated D40 sample (lane 2) is already of lower molecular weight compared to the N40 (lane 1) and after PNGase F digestion (lanes 3-6) both samples show an identical migration pattern, indicating complete removal of the N-linked glycans. PNGase reactions were carried out in two ways. Specifically, either the peptide was denatured prior to enzyme application (lane 3 and 4) or the native peptide was treated with PNGase F (lanes 5 and 6). Glycan removal was equally effective both ways tested. (B) Recombinant human FLAG-MOR N-terminal region-human Fc peptide was purified from the culture media of HEK293S (wild-type) (lanes 1-4) or HEK293S GnT1- (lanes 5-8). SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie staining revealed that under conditions where glycosylation is defective or abolished N40 and D40 MOR peptide migrate at the same molecular weight (lanes 5 and 6) regardless of PNGase F treatment.
No entities extracted from this document yet.
No uploaded files.
| Citation | PMID | DOI | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| AkenBL, AylingS, BarrellD, ClarkeL, CurwenV, FairleyS The Ensembl gene annotation system. Database (Oxford) 2016; 2016.10.1093/database/baw093PMC491903527337980 | β | β | β |
| Al-HasaniR, BruchasMR. Molecular mechanisms of opioid receptor-dependent signaling and behavior. Anesthesiology 2011; 115(6): 1363β1381.2202014010.1097/ALN.0b013e318238bba6PMC3698859 | β | β | β |
| BartG, KreekMJ, OttJ, LaForgeKS, ProudnikovD, PollakL Increased attributable risk related to a functional mu-opioid receptor gene polymorphism in association with alcohol dependence in central Sweden. Neuropsychopharmacology 2005; 30(2): 417β422.1552599910.1038/sj.npp.1300598 | β | β | β |
| BefortK, FilliolD, DecaillotFM, Gaveriaux-RuffC, HoeheMR, KiefferBL. A single nucleotide polymorphic mutation in the human mu-opioid receptor severely impairs receptor signaling. J Biol Chem 2001; 276(5): 3130β3137.1106784610.1074/jbc.M006352200 | β | β | β |
| BeyerA, KochT, SchroderH, SchulzS, HolltV. Effect of the A118G polymorphism on binding affinity, potency and agonist-mediated endocytosis, desensitization, and resensitization of the human mu-opioid receptor. J Neurochem 2004; 89(3): 553β560.1508651210.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02340.x | β | β | β |
| BilbaoA, RobinsonJE, HeiligM, MalangaCJ, SpanagelR, SommerWH A Pharmacogenetic Determinant of Mu-Opioid Receptor Antagonist Effects on Alcohol Reward and Consumption: Evidence from Humanized Mice. Biological psychiatry 2014.10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.08.02125442002 | β | β | β |
| BondC, LaForgeKS, TianM, MeliaD, ZhangS, BorgL Single-nucleotide polymorphism in the human mu opioid receptor gene alters beta-endorphin binding and activity: possible implications for opiate addiction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95(16): 9608β9613.968912810.1073/pnas.95.16.9608PMC21386 | β | β | β |
| Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Opioid overdose: understanding the epidemic. 2017. | β | β | β |
| ComolettiD, MillerMT, JeffriesCM, WilsonJ, DemelerB, TaylorP The macromolecular architecture of extracellular domain of alphaNRXN1: domain organization, flexibility, and insights into trans-synaptic disposition. Structure 2010; 18(8): 1044β1053.2069640310.1016/j.str.2010.06.005PMC2948785 | β | β | β |
| ContetC, KiefferBL, BefortK. Mu opioid receptor: a gateway to drug addiction. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2004; 14(3): 370β378.1519411810.1016/j.conb.2004.05.005 | β | β | β |
| DucatE, RayB, BartG, UmemuraY, VaronJ, HoA Mu-opioid receptor A118G polymorphism in healthy volunteers affects hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis adrenocorticotropic hormone stress response to metyrapone. Addict Biol 2013; 18(2): 325β331.2150715110.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00313.xPMC3789604 | β | β | β |
| EhlersCL, LindPA, WilhelmsenKC. Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in the mu opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) and self-reported responses to alcohol in American Indians. BMC Med Genet 2008; 9: 35.1843350210.1186/1471-2350-9-35PMC2386778 | β | β | β |
| EnochMA. Genetic influences on response to alcohol and response to pharmacotherapies for alcoholism. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2014; 123: 17β24.2422001910.1016/j.pbb.2013.11.001PMC4016188 | β | β | β |
| EnochMA. Genetic influences on the development of alcoholism. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2013; 15(11): 412.2409193610.1007/s11920-013-0412-1PMC4159132 | β | β | β |
| GerritsMA, LesscherHB, van ReeJM. Drug dependence and the endogenous opioid system. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2003; 13(6): 424β434.1463695810.1016/j.euroneuro.2003.08.003 | β | β | β |
| GuptaA, RozenfeldR, GomesI, RaehalKM, DecaillotFM, BohnLM Post-activation-mediated changes in opioid receptors detected by N-terminal antibodies. J Biol Chem 2008; 283(16): 10735β10744.1825603310.1074/jbc.M709454200PMC2447646 | β | β | β |
| HuangP, ChenC, MagueSD, BlendyJA, Liu-ChenLY. A common single nucleotide polymorphism A118G of the mu opioid receptor alters its N-glycosylation and protein stability. Biochem J 2012; 441(1): 379β386.2186429710.1042/BJ20111050PMC3923516 | β | β | β |
| JohnsonSW, NorthRA. Opioids excite dopamine neurons by hyperpolarization of local interneurons. J Neurosci 1992; 12(2): 483β488.134680410.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-02-00483.1992PMC6575608 | β | β | β |
| KauerJA, MalenkaRC. Synaptic plasticity and addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007; 8(11): 844β858.1794803010.1038/nrn2234 | β | β | β |
| KimSG, KimCM, KangDH, KimYJ, ByunWT, KimSY Association of functional opioid receptor genotypes with alcohol dependence in Koreans. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2004; 28(7): 986β990.1525228310.1097/01.alc.0000130803.62768.ab | β | β | β |
| KollerG, ZillP, RujescuD, RidingerM, PogarellO, FehrC Possible association between OPRM1 genetic variance at the 118 locus and alcohol dependence in a large treatment sample: relationship to alcohol dependence symptoms. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2012; 36(7): 1230β1236.2230903810.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01714.x | β | β | β |
| KroslakT, LaforgeKS, GianottiRJ, HoA, NielsenDA, KreekMJ. The single nucleotide polymorphism A118G alters functional properties of the human mu opioid receptor. J Neurochem 2007; 103(1): 77β87.1787763310.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04738.x | β | β | β |
| LaForgeKS, YuferovV, KreekMJ. Opioid receptor and peptide gene polymorphisms: potential implications for addictions. Eur J Pharmacol 2000; 410(2-3): 249β268.1113467410.1016/s0014-2999(00)00819-0 | β | β | β |
| LiangX, PotterJ, KumarS, ZouY, QuintanillaR, SridharanM Rapid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via Cas9 protein transfection. Journal of biotechnology 2015; 208: 44β53.2600388410.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.04.024 | β | β | β |
| Lopez SotoEJ, RaingoJ. A118G Mu Opioid Receptor polymorphism increases inhibitory effects on CaV2.2 channels. Neurosci Lett 2012; 523(2): 190β194.2279665110.1016/j.neulet.2012.06.074 | β | β | β |
| MagueSD, BlendyJA. OPRM1 SNP (A118G): involvement in disease development, treatment response, and animal models. Drug Alcohol Depend 2010; 108(3): 172β182.2007487010.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.12.016PMC2887703 | β | β | β |
| MagueSD, IsiegasC, HuangP, Liu-ChenLY, LermanC, BlendyJA. Mouse model of OPRM1 (A118G) polymorphism has sex-specific effects on drug-mediated behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106(26): 10847β10852.1952865810.1073/pnas.0901800106PMC2705603 | β | β | β |
| MahmoudS, ThorsellA, SommerWH, HeiligM, HolgateJK, BartlettSE Pharmacological consequence of the A118G mu opioid receptor polymorphism on morphine- and fentanyl-mediated modulation of Ca(2)(+) channels in humanized mouse sensory neurons. Anesthesiology 2011; 115(5): 1054β1062.2192656210.1097/ALN.0b013e318231fc11PMC3203255 | β | β | β |
| MargasW, ZubkoffI, SchulerHG, JanickiPK, Ruiz-VelascoV. Modulation of Ca2+ channels by heterologously expressed wild-type and mutant human micro-opioid receptors (hMORs) containing the A118G single-nucleotide polymorphism. J Neurophysiol 2007; 97(2): 1058β1067.1715122110.1152/jn.01007.2006 | β | β | β |
| MargolisEB, HjelmstadGO, FujitaW, FieldsHL. Direct bidirectional mu-opioid control of midbrain dopamine neurons. J Neurosci 2014; 34(44): 14707β14716.2535522310.1523/JNEUROSCI.2144-14.2014PMC4212068 | β | β | β |
| MaximovA, PangZP, TervoDG, SudhofTC. Monitoring synaptic transmission in primary neuronal cultures using local extracellular stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 2007; 161(1): 75β87.1711845910.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.009 | β | β | β |
| MillerGM, BendorJ, TiefenbacherS, YangH, NovakMA, MadrasBK. A mu-opioid receptor single nucleotide polymorphism in rhesus monkey: association with stress response and aggression. Mol Psychiatry 2004; 9(1): 99β108.1469944710.1038/sj.mp.4001378 | β | β | β |
| MirandaR, RayL, JustusA, MeyersonLA, KnopikVS, McGearyJ Initial evidence of an association between OPRM1 and adolescent alcohol misuse. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2010; 34(1): 112β122.1986080010.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01073.xPMC3691683 | β | β | β |
| MooreJC, SheldonMH, HartRP. Biobanking in the Era of the Stem Cell: A Technical and Operational Guide. Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences2012, 78pp. | β | β | β |
| NishizawaD, HanW, HasegawaJ, IshidaT, NumataY, SatoT Association of mu-opioid receptor gene polymorphism A118G with alcohol dependence in a Japanese population. Neuropsychobiology 2006; 53(3): 137β141.1667977710.1159/000093099 | β | β | β |
| OniEN, HalikereA, LiG, Toro-RamosAJ, SwerdelMR, VerpeutJL Increased nicotine response in iPSC-derived human neurons carrying the CHRNA5 N398 allele. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 34341.2769840910.1038/srep34341PMC5048107 | β | β | β |
| PerkinsKA, LermanC, GrottenthalerA, CiccocioppoMM, MilanakM, ConklinCA Dopamine and opioid gene variants are associated with increased smoking reward and reinforcement owing to negative mood. Behav Pharmacol 2008; 19(5-6): 641β649.1869011810.1097/FBP.0b013e32830c367cPMC2717609 | β | β | β |
| RayLA, HutchisonKE. A polymorphism of the mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) and sensitivity to the effects of alcohol in humans. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2004; 28(12): 1789β1795.1560859410.1097/01.alc.0000148114.34000.b9 | β | β | β |
| RayR, RuparelK, NewbergA, WileytoEP, LougheadJW, DivgiC Human Mu Opioid Receptor (OPRM1 A118G) polymorphism is associated with brain mu-opioid receptor binding potential in smokers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108(22): 9268β9273.2157646210.1073/pnas.1018699108PMC3107291 | β | β | β |
| RobinsonJE, VardyE, DiBertoJF, CheferVI, WhiteKL, FishEW Receptor Reserve Moderates Mesolimbic Responses to Opioids in a Humanized Mouse Model of the OPRM1 A118G Polymorphism. Neuropsychopharmacology 2015; 40(11): 2614β2622.2588111510.1038/npp.2015.109PMC4569952 | β | β | β |
| RommelspacherH, SmolkaM, SchmidtLG, SamochowiecJ, HoeheMR. Genetic analysis of the mu-opioid receptor in alcohol-dependent individuals. Alcohol 2001; 24(2): 129β135.1152243410.1016/s0741-8329(01)00139-2 | β | β | β |
| SanderJD, MaederML, ReyonD, VoytasDF, JoungJK, DobbsD. ZiFiT (Zinc Finger Targeter): an updated zinc finger engineering tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38(Web Server issue): W462β468.2043567910.1093/nar/gkq319PMC2896148 | β | β | β |
| ScarnatiMS, HalikereA, PangZP. Using human stem cells as a model system to understand the neural mechanisms of alcohol use disorders: Current status and outlook. Alcohol 2018.10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.03.008PMC616719730087005 | β | β | β |
| SzetoCY, TangNL, LeeDT, StadlinA. Association between mu opioid receptor gene polymorphisms and Chinese heroin addicts. Neuroreport 2001; 12(6): 1103β1106.1133817310.1097/00001756-200105080-00011 | β | β | β |
| VierbuchenT, OstermeierA, PangZP, KokubuY, SudhofTC, WernigM. Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors. Nature 2010; 463(7284): 1035β1041.2010743910.1038/nature08797PMC2829121 | β | β | β |
| WandGS, McCaulM, YangX, ReynoldsJ, GotjenD, LeeS The mu-opioid receptor gene polymorphism (A118G) alters HPA axis activation induced by opioid receptor blockade. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002; 26(1): 106β114.1175103710.1016/S0893-133X(01)00294-9 | β | β | β |
| WangYJ, HuangP, BlendyJA, Liu-ChenLY. Brain region- and sex-specific alterations in DAMGO-stimulated [ S]GTPgammaS binding in mice with Oprm1 A112G. Addiction biology 2012.10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00484.xPMC386454622862850 | β | β | β |
| WangYJ, HuangP, UngA, BlendyJA, Liu-ChenLY. Reduced expression of the mu opioid receptor in some, but not all, brain regions in mice with OPRM1 A112G. Neuroscience 2012; 205: 178β184.2224025110.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.12.033PMC3772531 | β | β | β |
| WilliamsJT, IngramSL, HendersonG, ChavkinC, von ZastrowM, SchulzS Regulation of mu-opioid receptors: desensitization, phosphorylation, internalization, and tolerance. Pharmacol Rev 2013; 65(1): 223β254.2332115910.1124/pr.112.005942PMC3565916 | β | β | β |
| YangN, ChandaS, MarroS, NgYH, JanasJA, HaagD Generation of pure GABAergic neurons by transcription factor programming. Nat Methods 2017; 14(6): 621β628.2850467910.1038/nmeth.4291PMC5567689 | β | β | β |
| ZhangY, WangD, JohnsonAD, PappAC, SadeeW. Allelic expression imbalance of human mu opioid receptor (OPRM1) caused by variant A118G. J Biol Chem 2005; 280(38): 32618β32624.1604639510.1074/jbc.M504942200 | β | β | β |
In this knowledge base
| Title | Year | PMID |
|---|---|---|
| Alcohol reverses the effects of KCNJ6 (GIRK2) noncoding variants on excitability of human glutamatergic neurons. | 2023 | 36207584 |
External
| Title | Authors | Journal | Year | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advancing substance use disorder biology by studying underlying gene x environment interactions. | Sidamon-Eristoff AE et al. | β | 2026 | β |
| Mutations of schizophrenia risk gene SETD1A dysregulate synaptic function in human neurons. | Su X et al. | β | 2025 | β |
| Analyses of the autism-associated neuroligin-3 R451C mutation in human neurons reveal a gain-of-function synaptic mechanism. | Wang L et al. | β | 2024 | β |
| Comparing stem cells, transdifferentiation and brain organoids as tools for psychiatric research. | Bellon A | β | 2024 | β |
| Investigating the neurobiology of maternal opioid use disorder and prenatal opioid exposure using brain organoid technology. | Dwivedi I et al. | β | 2024 | β |
| Polygenic risk for alcohol use disorder affects cellular responses to ethanol exposure in a human microglial cell model. | Li X et al. | β | 2024 | β |
| Postmortem-derived iPSC models in substance use disorders research. | Mendez EF et al. | β | 2024 | β |
| Receptor Pharmacogenomics: Deciphering Genetic Influence on Drug Response. | Anghel SA et al. | β | 2024 | β |
| Scaled and Efficient Derivation of Loss of Function Alleles in Risk Genes for Neurodevelopmental and Psychiatric Disorders in Human iPSC | Zhang H et al. | β | 2024 | β |
| Scaled and efficient derivation of loss-of-function alleles in risk genes for neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in human iPSCs. | Zhang H et al. | β | 2024 | β |
| Upregulated GIRK2 Counteracts Ethanol-Induced Changes in Excitability and Respiration in Human Neurons. | Prytkova I et al. | β | 2024 | β |
| 5. Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism: Functional genomics. | Gameiro-Ros I et al. | β | 2023 | β |
| A human stem cell-derived neuronal model of morphine exposure reflects brain dysregulation in opioid use disorder: Transcriptomic and epigenetic characterization of postmortem-derived iPSC neurons. | Mendez EF et al. | β | 2023 | β |
| Alcohol reverses the effects of KCNJ6 (GIRK2) noncoding variants on excitability of human glutamatergic neurons. | Popova D et al. | β | 2023 | β |
| Methods for shipping live primary cortical and hippocampal neuron cultures from postnatal mice. | Sammoura FM et al. | β | 2023 | β |
| On the utilization of the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) model to study substance use disorders: A scoping review protocol. | Niemis W et al. | β | 2023 | β |
| Whole Cell Patch Clamp Electrophysiology in Human Neuronal Cells. | Gabriel R et al. | β | 2023 | β |
| Association between rs1799971 in the mu opioid receptor gene and methadone maintenance treatment response. | Xie X et al. | β | 2022 | β |
| Optimized splitting of mixed-species RNA sequencing data. | Song X et al. | β | 2022 | β |
| Pharmacogenetics of Addiction Therapy. | Graham DP et al. | β | 2022 | β |
| Deciphering pathogenicity of variants of uncertain significance with CRISPR-edited iPSCs. | Guo H et al. | β | 2021 | β |
| Genetic Vulnerability to Opioid Addiction. | Reed B et al. | β | 2021 | β |
| Making Sense of Patient-Derived iPSCs, Transdifferentiated Neurons, Olfactory Neuronal Cells, and Cerebral Organoids as Models for Psychiatric Disorders. | Unterholzner J et al. | β | 2021 | β |
| Opioid Addiction and Opioid Receptor Dimerization: Structural Modeling of the OPRD1 and OPRM1 Heterodimer and Its Signaling Pathways. | Wu B et al. | β | 2021 | β |
| Population-specific genetic background for the OPRM1 variant rs1799971 (118A>G): implications for genomic medicine and functional analysis. | Levran O et al. | β | 2021 | β |
| Association of OPRM1 Functional Coding Variant With Opioid Use Disorder: A Genome-Wide Association Study. | Zhou H et al. | β | 2020 | β |
| Differential sensitivity of human neurons carrying ΞΌ opioid receptor (MOR) N40D variants in response to ethanol. | Scarnati MS et al. | β | 2020 | β |
| Induced pluripotent stem cells as a platform to understand patient-specific responses to opioids and anaesthetics. | Obal D et al. | β | 2020 | β |
| Molecular Correlates of Topiramate and GRIK1 rs2832407 Genotype in Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Cultures. | Lieberman R et al. | β | 2020 | β |
| Molecular Psychiatry, August 2020: new impact factor, and highlights of recent advances in psychiatry, including an overview of the brain's response to stress during infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). | Licinio J et al. | β | 2020 | β |
| Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in developing a response to the opioid epidemic. | Balyan R et al. | β | 2020 | β |
| Post-translational Modifications of Opioid Receptors. | Lemos Duarte M et al. | β | 2020 | β |