Incident seriousness and AP at baseline were linked to the differential PFI efficacy across the BMI and WF conditions. Of the mandated students who experienced a serious incident, those who were assigned to the BMI were more likely to be in the improved than non-improved group, logit = 1.56, odds ratio (OR) = 4.76, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.21 – 18.66, p < .05 (see Figure 4 for simple slopes). In addition, of the mandated students who reported higher levels of AP at baseline, those who were assigned to the BMI were more likely, compared to those in the WF, to be in the improved group, logit = 1.43, OR = 4.18, 95% CI = 2.02 – 8.64, p < .01 (see Figure 5 for simple slopes). All other individual and situational factors were not statistically significant moderators.12
