Individual and situational factors that influence the efficacy of personalized feedback substance use interventions for mandated college students.

paper Cited Public

Authors: Mun, Eun Young; White, Helene R; Morgan, Thomas J
Year: 2009
Journal: Journal of consulting and clinical psychology
PMID: 19170456
DOI: 10.1037/a0014679
PMCID: PMC2818838

#	Section	Preview
0	Personalized Feedback Interventions	The available evidence suggests that individually-oriented, multi-component interventions that…
1	Personalized Feedback Interventions	will increase a student's readiness to change his or her drinking behaviors (Miller & Rollnick,…
2	Personalized Feedback Interventions	Few studies, however, have empirically examined moderating factors of PFIs on drinking outcomes.…
3	Individual and Situational Factors that Influence PFI Efficacy — Pre-intervention drinking levels	It has been suggested that PFIs may have a greater effect for heavier drinkers than for lighter…
4	Individual and Situational Factors that Influence PFI Efficacy — Pre-intervention drinking levels	used α = .15 as the Type I error rate due to a small sample size. In contrast, in a large sample of…
5	Individual and Situational Factors that Influence PFI Efficacy — Pre-intervention drinking levels	This apparent inconsistency regarding whether pre-intervention alcohol use levels play a role in PFI…
6	Individual and Situational Factors that Influence PFI Efficacy — Pre-intervention drinking levels	lower ends of the spectrum, which may have resulted in lowered power. Second, previously reported…
7	Individual and Situational Factors that Influence PFI Efficacy — Pre-intervention drinking levels	dichotomization approach may be arbitrary. In recent studies of natural trajectories of alcohol use…
8	Individual and Situational Factors that Influence PFI Efficacy — Pre-intervention drinking levels — Incident seriousness	Existing studies on mandated students have not paid much attention to the possibility that mandated…
9	Individual and Situational Factors that Influence PFI Efficacy — Pre-intervention drinking levels — Incident seriousness	linked to incident aversiveness and prior alcohol-related problems (AP) were also negatively…
10	Individual and Situational Factors that Influence PFI Efficacy — Readiness to change	The findings that an incident itself (or self-regulation following it) has an effect on behavior…
11	Individual and Situational Factors that Influence PFI Efficacy — Positive alcohol expectancies	Alcohol expectancies are defined as “structures in long-term memory that have impact on cognitive…
12	Individual and Situational Factors that Influence PFI Efficacy — Gender	A number of studies have also looked at gender as a potential moderator of PFI efficacy among…
13	Individual and Situational Factors that Influence PFI Efficacy — First-year student in college and other drug use	First-year students in college are generally considered to be at risk for excessive alcohol use.…
14	The Current Study	The current study sought to examine whether some mandated students reduce alcohol use more following…
15	The Current Study	We then used empirically identified groups as the outcome variable in subsequent logistic regression…
16	Method — Participants	Participants were students mandated to a university Alcohol and Other Drug Assistance Program…
17	Method — Participants	alcohol or drugs but had never used them themselves). Because this was a randomized study and there…
18	Method — Procedures and Interventions	All students referred to ADAPS completed a baseline assessment questionnaire. Using data from the…
19	Method — Procedures and Interventions	Students returned approximately a week later and were randomly assigned (by a flip of a coin) to…

Name	Type
abstainers	phenotype
action stage local	phenotype
acute intoxication local	phenotype
ADAPS local	cohort
adolescents	cohort
alcohol	phenotype
Alcohol and Other Drug Assistance Program (ADAPS) local	cohort
Alcohol Problems	phenotype
Alcohol reduction local	phenotype
alcohol-related injury local	phenotype
alcohol-related outcomes	phenotype
alcohol-related problems	phenotype
alcohol-related violation local	phenotype
Alcohol-Related Violations local	phenotype
Alcohol Use	phenotype
Alcohol use levels local	phenotype
AP	drug
AP levels local	phenotype
athletes local	cohort
at-risk groups	phenotype
Barnett et al. 2006 local	cohort
baseline drinking severity local	phenotype
Baseline drinking severity local	phenotype
binge drinking	phenotype
blood alcohol concentration	phenotype
BMI local	cohort
BMI local	drug
BMI	phenotype
BMI condition local	cohort
BMI group local	cohort
Brief motivational intervention local	phenotype
Brief Motivational Intervention local	drug
Brief Motivational Intervention local	phenotype
Brief Motivational Interview local	phenotype
cigarettes	phenotype
class 1	cohort
class 2	cohort
class 3	cohort
class 4	cohort
Clinical trial studies local	cohort
college students	cohort
College volunteer sample local	cohort
contemplation stage local	phenotype
depression	phenotype
drinkers	phenotype
drinking	phenotype
drinks per week	phenotype
Driving under the influence	phenotype
drug	drug
drug dependence	phenotype
drugs	drug
emerging adulthood	cohort
EMS/hospital local	cohort
excessive alcohol consumption	phenotype
family history of alcoholism	phenotype
First Offenders local	cohort
first-year in college local	phenotype
first-year student local	cohort
First-year student local	cohort
first-year students local	cohort
First-year students local	cohort
Greek students local	cohort
heavy drinking	phenotype
Heavy Drinking Volunteer Students local	cohort
HED	phenotype
high alcohol problems local	phenotype
high-risk groups local	phenotype
High-risk students local	cohort
hospitalization	phenotype
illegal behaviors	phenotype
improved group local	cohort
Improved group local	cohort
Improved group local	phenotype
Improved Group local	cohort
improved group membership local	phenotype
Improved group membership local	phenotype
Improved Group Membership local	phenotype
incident aversiveness local	phenotype
incident requiring medical or police attention local	phenotype
incident seriousness local	phenotype
Incident seriousness local	phenotype
incoming students local	cohort
individual and situational factors local	phenotype
intervention condition local	phenotype
intervention outcome local	phenotype
intoxication	phenotype
Law enforcement personnel local	cohort
Less heavy drinker local	phenotype
light drinkers	phenotype
Lighter Drinking Individuals local	phenotype
Liquid courage	phenotype
Low-risk Mandated Students local	cohort
mailed PFI local	drug
Mandated college students local	cohort
Mandated Participants local	cohort
mandated students	cohort
marijuana	phenotype
medical problems	phenotype
Motivational Interview local	drug
motivation to change alcohol use local	phenotype
motivation to change drinking local	phenotype
Negative alcohol expectancy local	phenotype
Negative consequences of alcohol use local	phenotype
non first-year student local	cohort
Non First-Year Student local	phenotype
Non first-year students local	cohort
non-improved group local	cohort
non-improved group local	phenotype
Non-improved group local	cohort
Non-improved group local	phenotype
Non-Improved Group local	cohort
non-serious incident local	phenotype
Non-serious incident local	phenotype
No-treatment control group	cohort
other drugs	drug
other drug use	phenotype
other substances	phenotype
outcome	phenotype
personal attribution of the incident local	phenotype
Personalized Feedback Intervention local	drug
Personalized Feedback Intervention local	phenotype
Personalized Feedback Interventions local	phenotype
PFI local	drug
PFI conditions local	cohort
PFI efficacy local	phenotype
PFIs local	drug
positive alcohol expectancies	phenotype
precontemplation stage local	phenotype
pre-intervention drinking levels local	phenotype
present study	cohort
prior alcohol-related problems local	phenotype
prior alcohol use local	phenotype
problematic behaviors local	phenotype
readiness to change	phenotype
Residence hall advisor local	cohort
risky drinking	phenotype
serious incident local	phenotype
Serious incident local	phenotype
Serious Incident local	phenotype
sex	phenotype
Sexuality local	phenotype
sociability	phenotype
social desirability local	phenotype
Social Desirability local	phenotype
study cohort	cohort
substance use	phenotype
Tension reduction	phenotype
three distinctive groups local	phenotype
Unplanned sex after using alcohol or drugs local	phenotype
Vader & Harris 2007 local	cohort
Volunteer college samples local	cohort
volunteer students local	cohort
Volunteer students local	cohort
Volunteer Students local	cohort
Web-based Feedback local	phenotype
Web Feedback local	drug
Weekly drinking local	phenotype
WF local	cohort
WF local	drug
WF group local	cohort
white and Asian American students local	cohort
Written feedback only condition local	cohort

Citation	PMID	DOI	Status
Aguinis, H et al., Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997, Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power.	—	—	—
Anderson, DS et al., Promising practices sourcebook: Campus alcohol strategies, 1996	—	—	—
Anderson, DS et al., Promising practices sourcebook: Campus alcohol strategies, 2001	—	—	—
Andrews, P et al., Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2003, Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale and sort form C: Forensic norms.	12652639	10.1002/jclp.10136	Cited
Arnett, JJ, American Psychologist, 2000, Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.	10842426	—	Cited
Arnett, JJ, Child Development Perspectives, 2007, Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for?	—	—	—
Baer, JS et al., American Journal of Public Health, 2001, Brief intervention for heavy drinking college students: Four-year follow-up and natural history.	11499124	10.2105/ajph.91.8.1310	Cited
Baer, JS et al., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1992, An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults.	1460160	10.1037//0022-006x.60.6.974	Cited
Barnett, NP et al., Addictive Behaviors, 2007, Brief motivational intervention vs. computerized alcohol education with college students mandated to intervention.	17707594	10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.017	Cited
Barnett, NP et al., Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 2006, “I'll never drink like that again”: Characteristics of alcohol-related incidents and predictors of motivation to change in college students.	16847545	10.15288/jsa.2006.67.754	Cited
Barnett, NP et al., Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 2008, Profiles of college students mandated to alcohol intervention.	18781243	10.15288/jsad.2008.69.684	Cited
Barnett, NP et al., Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 2005, Mandatory alcohol intervention for alcohol abusing college students: A systematic review.	16135343	10.1016/j.jsat.2005.05.007	Cited
Bates, ME, Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 2000, Integrating person-centered and variable-centered approaches in the study of developmental courses and transitions in alcohol use: Introduction to the special section.	10888078	—	Cited
Bauer, DJ et al., Psychological Methods, 2003, Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes.	14596495	10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.338	Cited
Bauer, DJ et al., Psychological Methods, 2004, The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities.	15053717	10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.3	Cited
Bauer, DJ, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007, Observations on the use of growth mixture models in psychological research.	—	—	—
Beck, AT et al., Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1984, Internal consistencies of the original and revised Beck Depression Inventory.	6511949	10.1002/1097-4679(198411)40:6<1365::aid-jclp2270400615>3.0.co;2-d	Cited
Bergman, LR et al., Development and Psychopathology, 1997, A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology.	9201446	10.1017/s095457949700206x	Cited
Bongers, IL et al., Child Development, 2004, Developmental trajectories of externalizing behaviors in childhood and adolescence.	15369529	10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00755.x	Cited
Borsari, B et al., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2000, Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers.	10965648	—	Cited
Borsari, B et al., Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2005, Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students.	16187809	10.1037/0893-164X.19.3.296	Cited
Budd, RJ et al., British Journal of Health Psychology, 1996, The structure of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire: A test of Prochaska & DiClemente's transtheoretical model.	—	—	—
Carey, KB et al., Addictive Behaviors, 2007, Individual-led interventions to reduce college student drinking: A meta-analytic review.	17590277	10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.004	Cited
Carey, KB et al., Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1999, Assessing readiness to change substance abuse: A critical review of instruments.	—	—	—
Carey, KB et al., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2006, Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized control.	17032098	10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.943	Cited
Carey, KB et al., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2007, Which heavy drinking college students benefit from a brief motivational intervention?	17663621	10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.663	Cited
Celeux, G et al., Journal of Classification, 1996, An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model.	—	—	—
Chiauzzi, E et al., Journal of American College Health, 2005, My student body: A high risk drinking prevention website for college students.	15900990	10.3200/JACH.53.6.263-274	Cited
Cohen, J, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 1988	—	—	—
Crowne, DP et al., Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1960, A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.	13813058	10.1037/h0047358	Cited
Curran, PJ et al., American Journal of Community Psychology, 1999, The application of latent curve analysis to testing developmental theories in intervention research.	10573835	10.1023/A:1022137429115	Cited
Curran, PJ et al., Development and Psychopathology, 2003, Implications of latent trajectory models for the study of developmental psychopathology.	14582933	10.1017/s0954579403000300	Cited
Dimeff, LA et al., Brief alcohol screening and intervention for college students: A harm reduction approach, 1999	—	—	—
Engs, RC et al., Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 1994, The drinking patterns and problems of a national sample of college students.	—	—	—
Everitt, BS et al., Cluster analysis, 2001	—	—	—
Fan, X, Structural Equation Modeling, 2003, Power of latent growth modeling for detecting group differences in linear growth trajectory parameters.	—	—	—
Foster, EM et al., Applied Developmental Science, 2003, Issues in the economic evaluation of prevention programs.	20228955	10.1207/S1532480XADS0702_4	Cited
Foster, EM et al., Developmental Psychology, 2008, New methods for new questions: Obstacles and opportunities.	18331123	10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.301	Cited
Fromme, K et al., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2004, Prevention of heavy drinking and associated negative consequences among mandated and voluntary college students.	15612850	10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1038	Cited
Fromme, K et al., Psychological Assessment, 1993, Comprehensive effects of alcohol: Development and psychometric assessment of a new expectancy questionnaire.	—	—	—
Heather, N et al., Addiction, 1993, Predictive validity of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire.	8130706	10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02042.x	Cited
Hingson, R et al., Annual Review of Public Health, 2005, Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24: Changes from 1998 to 2001.	15760289	10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144652	Cited
Hingson, R et al., Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 2002, Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24.	12033690	10.15288/jsa.2002.63.136	Cited
Johnston, LD et al., Monitoring the Future: National survey results on drug use, 1975-2006 (Volume I. Secondary School Students), 2007	—	—	—
Jones, BT et al., Addiction, 2001, A review of expectancy theory and alcohol consumption.	11177520	10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961575.x	Cited
Larimer, ME et al., Addictive Behaviors, 2007, Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: Individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006.	17604915	10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.006	Cited
Larimer, ME et al., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2007, Personalized mailed feedback for college drinking prevention: A randomized clinical trial.	17469886	10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.285	Cited
Larimer, ME et al., Journal of Studies on Alcohol (Supplement), 2002, Identification, prevention and treatment: A review of individual-focused strategies to reduce problematic alcohol consumption by college students.	12022721	10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.148	Cited
Larimer, ME et al., Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 2001, Evaluating a brief intervention with fraternities.	11414347	10.15288/jsa.2001.62.370	Cited
Little, RJA et al., Statistical analysis with missing data, 1987	—	—	—
Little, RJA, Journal of American Statistical Association, 1988, A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values.	—	—	—
Marlatt, GA et al., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1998, Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: Results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.	9735576	10.1037//0022-006x.66.4.604	Cited
McCartney, K et al., Child Development, 2000, Effect size, practical importance, and social policy for children.	10836571	10.1111/1467-8624.00131	Cited
McClelland, GH et al., Psychological Bulletin, 1993, Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects.	8416037	10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376	Cited
Miller, WR et al., Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change, 2002	—	—	—
Morgan, TJ et al., Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 2008, Changes in drinking prior to a mandated brief intervention with college students.	18299770	10.15288/jsad.2008.69.286	Cited
Mun, EY et al., Development and Psychopathology, 2008, A model-based cluster analysis approach to adolescent problem behaviors and young adult outcomes.	18211739	10.1017/S095457940800014X	Cited
Mun, EY et al., Structural Equation Modeling, 2009, A structural equation modeling approach for the evaluation of intervention effects using pre-post-post designs.	20228953	10.1080/10705510902751358	Cited
Murphy, JG et al., Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 2004, A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview.	15151350	10.15288/jsa.2004.65.200	Cited
Murphy, JG et al., Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2001, Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers.	11767271	10.1037//0893-164x.15.4.373	Cited
Muthén, B et al., Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 2000, Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes.	10888079	—	Cited
Muthén, BO et al., Psychological Methods, 1997, General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation.	—	—	—
Muthén, BO, Psychological Methods, 2003, Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling: Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003).	14596497	10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.369	Cited
Muthén, LK et al., Mplus (Version 5.0) [Computer software]., 19982007	—	—	—
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, A call to action: Changing the culture of drinking at U.S. colleges, 2002	—	—	—
Neighbors, C et al., International Journal of Drug Policy, 2006, Harm reduction and individually focused alcohol prevention.	17301880	10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.05.004	Cited
Neighbors, C et al., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2004, Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: Efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention.	15279527	10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.434	Cited
Pocock, SJ et al., Statistics in Medicine, 2002, Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: Current practice and problems.	12325108	10.1002/sim.1296	Cited
Presley, CA et al., Alcohol and drugs on American campuses: Use, consequences, and perceptions of the campus environment, 1996	—	—	—
Raykov, T, Structural Equation Modeling, 2007, Longitudinal analysis with regressions among random effects: A latent variable modeling approach.	—	—	—
Reynolds, WM, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1982, Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale.	—	—	—
Sackett, PR et al., Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, On seeking moderator variables in the meta-analysis of correlational data: A Monte Carlo investigation of statistical power and resistance to type I error.	—	—	—
Sampson, RJ et al., Criminology, 2005, Seductions of method: Rejoinder to Nagin and Tremblay's “Developmental trajectory groups: fact or fiction?”	—	—	—
SAS Institute, SAS for Windows (Version 9) [Computer program]., 20022006	—	—	—
Schafer, JL, Analysis of incomplete multivariate data, 1997	—	—	—
Sher, KJ et al., Development and Psychopathology, 2004, Trajectories of dynamic predictors of disorder: The meanings and implications.	15704817	10.1017/s0954579404040039	Cited
Skrondal, A et al., Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models, 2004	—	—	—
SPSS Inc., SPSS for Windows (Version 16) [Computer program]., 19892007	—	—	—
von Eye, A et al., Development and Psychopathology, 2003, Research strategies in developmental psychopathology: Dimensional identity and the person-oriented approach.	14582932	10.1017/s0954579403000294	Cited
Walters, ST et al., Addictive Behaviors, 2005, Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: What, why and for whom?	15925126	10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.12.005	Cited
Walters, ST et al., Addictive Behaviors, 2007, Correlates of protective behavior utilization among heavy-drinking college students.	17669596	10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.022	Cited
Wechsler, H et al., Journal of American College Health, 2002, Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts: Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study surveys: 1993-2001.	11990979	10.1080/07448480209595713	Cited
Wechsler, H et al., Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 2001, Drinking levels, alcohol problems, and secondhand effects in substance-free college residences: Results of a national study.	11271961	10.15288/jsa.2001.62.23	Cited
White, HR et al., Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, 2007, Long-term effects of brief substance use interventions for mandated college students: Sleeper effects of an in-person personal feedback intervention.	17550361	10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00435.x	Cited
White, HR et al., Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 1988, Assessing alcohol problems in clinical and nonclinical adolescent populations.	—	—	—
White, HR et al., Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 2000, Longitudinal trends in problem drinking as measured by the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index	—	—	—
White, HR et al., Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1989, Toward the assessment of adolescent problem drinking.	2927120	10.15288/jsa.1989.50.30	Cited
White, HR et al., Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 2006, Evaluating two brief personal substance use interventions for mandated college students.	16562414	10.15288/jsa.2006.67.309	Cited
White, HR et al., Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2008, Do brief personalized feedback interventions work for mandated students or is it just getting caught that works?	18298236	10.1037/0893-164X.22.1.107	Cited
White, HR, International Journal of Drug Policy, 2006, Reduction of alcohol-related harm on United States college campuses: The use of personal feedback interventions.	—	—	—

In this knowledge base

Title	Year	PMID
Post-GWAS in Psychiatric Genetics: A Developmental Perspective on the "Other" Next Steps.	2018	29227573

External

Title	Authors	Journal	Year	Link
Trajectories of Alcohol-Related Problems Among First-Year Nursing Students: Nature, Predictors, and Outcomes.	Cheyroux P et al.	—	2026	→
Cross-Tailoring Integrative Alcohol and Risky Sexual Behavior Feedback for College Students: Protocol for a Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.	Ray AE et al.	—	2023	→
Do brief motivational interventions increase motivation for change in drinking among college students? A two-step meta-analysis of individual participant data.	Tan Z et al.	—	2023	→
Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.	Schwenker R et al.	—	2023	→
Does abstaining from alcohol in high school moderate intervention effects for college students? Implications for tiered intervention strategies.	Tan L et al.	—	2022	→
A comparison of global and egocentric network approaches for assessing peer alcohol use among college students in the United States.	Russell AM et al.	—	2020	→
A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial of Game Plan, A Web Application to Help Men Who Have Sex with Men Reduce Their HIV Risk and Alcohol Use.	Wray TB et al.	—	2019	→
The Influence of a Brief Alcohol Intervention on Alcohol Use Trajectories in Nonstudent Emerging Adult Drinkers.	Lau-Barraco C et al.	—	2019	→
Game Plan: Development of a Web App Designed to Help Men Who Have Sex With Men Reduce Their HIV Risk and Alcohol Use.	Wray T et al.	—	2018	→
Post-GWAS in Psychiatric Genetics: A Developmental Perspective on the "Other" Next Steps.	Dick DM et al.	—	2018	→
Mandated college students' response to sequentially administered alcohol interventions in a randomized clinical trial using stepped care.	Borsari B et al.	—	2016	→
Are there secondary effects on marijuana use from brief alcohol interventions for college students?	White HR et al.	—	2015	→
Brief motivational interventions for college student drinking may not be as powerful as we think: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis.	Huh D et al.	—	2015	→
Defining and characterizing differences in college alcohol intervention efficacy: A growth mixture modeling application.	Henson JM et al.	—	2015	→
Exploring outcomes and initial self-report of client motivation in a college counseling center.	Ilagan G et al.	—	2015	→
In-session processes of brief motivational interventions in two trials with mandated college students.	Borsari B et al.	—	2015	→
Personalized drinking feedback: A meta-analysis of in-person versus computer-delivered interventions.	Cadigan JM et al.	—	2015	→
Social network influences on initiation and maintenance of reduced drinking among college students.	Reid AE et al.	—	2015	→
Do drinking games matter? An examination by game type and gender in a mandated student sample.	Alfonso J et al.	—	2013	→
Effectiveness of a Feedback-Based Brief Intervention to Reduce Alcohol Use in Community Substance Use Disorders.	Worden BL et al.	—	2013	→
The effectiveness of the 'what do you drink' web-based brief alcohol intervention in reducing heavy drinking among students: a two-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial.	Voogt CV et al.	—	2013	→
Structuring a college alcohol prevention program on the low level of response to alcohol model: a pilot study.	Schuckit MA et al.	—	2012	→
Behavioral vaccines and evidence-based kernels: nonpharmaceutical approaches for the prevention of mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders.	Embry DD	—	2011	→
Incident-specific and individual-level moderators of brief intervention effects with mandated college students.	Mastroleo NR et al.	—	2011	→
Individual-focused approaches to the prevention of college student drinking.	Cronce JM et al.	—	2011	→
Motivational interviewing for substance abuse.	Smedslund G et al.	—	2011	→
A brief, web-based personalized feedback selective intervention for college student marijuana use: a randomized clinical trial.	Lee CM et al.	—	2010	→
What makes group MET work? A randomized controlled trial of college student drinkers in mandated alcohol diversion.	LaChance H et al.	—	2009	→