Such studies can be challenging to conduct in humans because of difficulties in obtaining accurate medical histories, maintaining adherence, confounding factors such as diet, sleep-wake cycles, and ethical considerations when studying large doses of ethanol. Rodent studies offer several advantages such as availability of transgenic models that can facilitate mechanistic studies. There are however some limitations to rodent studies. Rodents have a much shorter life span and often require forced (i.e., not initiated by the animal) exposure to alcohol, which is stressful. Moreover, a recent systematic comparison examining gene expression changes found that temporal gene response patterns to trauma, burns, and endotoxemia in mouse models correlated poorly with the human conditions (Seok, Warren et al. 2013). Nonhuman primates, on the other hand, voluntarily consume different amounts of alcohol and allow us to conduct studies in an outbred species that shares significant physiological and genetic homology with humans while maintaining rigorous control over diet and other environmental cues. Moreover, immune systems of several nonhuman primate species are similar to those of humans and these animals are susceptible to several clinically important
