The alcohol cues task elicited greater self-reported craving ratings to the alcohol versus water cues during both pre- and post-priming scans, as demonstrated by a significant main effect of cue type [F(1,16)=9.64, p=.007; Figure 2]. Further, craving ratings during the post-priming scan were found to be significantly greater than craving ratings during the pre-priming scan [F(1,16)=5.55, p=.032]. No interaction between cue-type and scan was observed (p=.775), and OPRM1 genotype did not significantly interact with either cue-type or scan (ps>.212).
