Gender-related effects of prefrontal cortex connectivity: a resting-state functional optical tomography study.
- Authors
- Chuang, Ching-Cheng; Sun, Chia-Wei
- Year
- 2014
- Journal
- Biomedical optics express
- PMID
- 25136481
- DOI
- 10.1364/BOE.5.002503
- PMCID
- PMC4132984
The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is thought to play an important role in "higher" brain functions such as personality and emotion that may associated with several gender-related mental disorders. In this study, the gender effects of functional connectivity, cortical lateralization and significantly differences in the PFC were investigated by using resting-state functional optical tomography (fOT) measurement. A total of forty subjects including twenty healthy male and twenty healthy female adults were recruited for this study. In the results, the hemoglobin responses are higher in the male group. Additionally, male group exhibited the stronger connectivity in the PFC regions. In the result of lateralization, leftward dominant was observed in the male group but bilateral dominance in the female group. Finally, the 11 channels of the inferior PFC regions (corresponding to the region of Brodmann area 45) are significant different with spectrum analysis. Our findings suggest that the resting-state fOT method can provide high potential to apply to clinical neuroscience for several gender-related mental disorders diagnosis.
The fOT channels localization. (Top left) the 3-D image of the optode position; (Bottom) The localizations of all 52 channels were positioned according to the international 10-20 system. Red and blue circles indicate near-infrared light emitter and detector positions, respectively. By using the international 10-20 system the detector 26 was positioned at the FZ marker point while the bottom row of sources 11, 13, 14 and 16 were placed on the T3–FP1–FP2–T4 line. Yellow diamonds indicate the measuring region of PFC.
LLM interpretation
This figure consists of a 3D anatomical model of a head (top left) and a 2D schematic diagram (bottom) illustrating the localization of 52 fOT channels. The schematic uses red circles for light sources and blue circles for detectors, with yellow diamonds marking the measuring regions of the prefrontal cortex. Positions are mapped according to the international 10-20 system, with specific markers labeled as $F_Z$, $F_{P1}$, $F_{P2}$, $T_3$, and $T_4$, and a grid spacing of 3 cm indicated.
The flowchart of resting-state fOT data analysis. (a) fOT channels localization above the PFC; (b) distribution of power spectrum within low-frequency band 0.01 to 0.08 Hz of ΔHbO2, ΔHb and ΔtHb for a single channel of one subject; (c) spectrogram from each channel of group-level statistics on averaging that was used for (d) significant difference analysis; (e) distribution of time series within low-frequency band 0.01 to 0.08 Hz of ΔHbO2, ΔHb and ΔtHb for a single channel of one subject that was used for correlation and lateralization analysis; (f) schematic diagram of group average correlation matrices for all channels; (g) schematic diagram of cortical lateralization analysis; (h) schematic diagram of functional connectivity in PFC; (i) schematic diagram of correlation coefficient between left vs. right PFC.
LLM interpretation
This figure is a multi-panel flowchart illustrating the resting-state fOT data analysis pipeline. It includes anatomical diagrams of channel localization (a), a power spectrum plot (b), a group-level spectrogram (c), and time-series data (e) for $\Delta\text{HbO}_2$, $\Delta\text{Hb}$, and $\Delta\text{tHb}$. The workflow concludes with schematic representations of group average correlation matrices (f), cortical lateralization (g), functional connectivity in the PFC (h), and correlation coefficients between the left and right PFC (i).
The correlation matrices derived from male and female groups. (a) and (d) are the correlation matrices of each pair channel of ΔHbO2; (b) and (e) are the correlation matrices of each pair channel of ΔHb; (c) and (f) are the correlation matrices of each pair channel of ΔtHb. Each figure shows a 52 × 52 square matrix, where the x and y axes correspond to the channels listed in optode geometry, and where each unit of matrix indicates the mean strength of the functional connectivity between each pair channel.
LLM interpretation
This figure consists of six correlation matrices (heatmaps) comparing functional connectivity across 52 channels for male (a-c) and female (d-f) groups. The matrices are categorized by hemodynamic measures: $\Delta\text{HbO}_2$, $\Delta\text{Hb}$, and $\Delta\text{tHb}$. A color scale on the right indicates correlation strength, ranging from approximately -0.2 (blue) to 1 (red), with the diagonal showing perfect positive correlation.
The distributions of correlation coefficient of male and female group of the same channel. (a), (b), and (c) are the distributions of correlation coefficient of ΔHbO2, ΔHb, and ΔtHb of male and female group of the same channel, respectively. The data were derived from correlation matrices. The red lines mean the result of linear regression. The dots mean the correlation coefficient of male and female group of the same channel.
LLM interpretation
This figure consists of three scatter plots (a, b, and c) comparing the correlation coefficients of male and female groups for $\Delta\text{HbO}_2$, $\Delta\text{Hb}$, and $\Delta\text{tHb}$, respectively. Each plot features a red linear regression line showing a positive correlation between the male and female groups. The strength of these correlations varies by channel, with $R^2$ values of 0.6342 for $\Delta\text{HbO}_2$, 0.3038 for $\Delta\text{Hb}$, and 0.6182 for $\Delta\text{tHb}$.
Correlation analysis of hemodynamic response between left vs. right (Ch 3 vs. Ch 8, Ch4 vs. Ch7 et al.) bilateral PFC regions from male and female groups. (a), (c), and (e) are the correlation analysis of male bilateral PFC regions of ΔHbO2, ΔHb, and ΔtHb, respectively. (b), (d), and (f) are the correlation analysis of female bilateral PFC regions of ΔHbO2, ΔHb, and ΔtHb, respectively. The color bars indicate the mean concentration changes of hemoglobin include ΔHbO2, ΔHb and ΔtHb.
LLM interpretation
This figure presents six heatmaps showing the correlation of hemodynamic responses between bilateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions for male (a, c, e) and female (b, d, f) groups. The maps analyze three variables: $\Delta\text{HbO}_2$, $\Delta\text{Hb}$, and $\Delta\text{tHb}$, with background colors representing mean concentration changes and overlaid shaded diamonds indicating correlation values based on a provided coding scheme. Correlation strength is categorized from $<0.2$ (lightest) to $>0.8$ (black), with the right and left PFC regions labeled across the horizontal axis.
The functional connectivity pattern of left-side and right-side PFC in resting-state of (a) male group and (b) female group. The red dots represent the channels of each PFC region. The orange lines represent the functional connectivity (group-level correlation network) of left-side and right-side PFC region with correlation coefficient rXY larger than 0.6.
LLM interpretation
This figure consists of two brain diagrams, (a) for the male group and (b) for the female group, illustrating functional connectivity patterns in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Red dots represent channels within the left and right PFC regions, while orange lines indicate group-level correlations with a coefficient $r_{XY} > 0.6$. Both groups show dense inter- and intra-hemispheric connectivity networks across the PFC regions.
Cortical dominance channel of PFC region by computing LI of all left vs. right channel pairs in resting-state. (a) The result of cortical dominance of male group. (b) The result of cortical dominance of female group. The channels of blue diamond indicate the dominance region of leftward or rightward, and others indicate bilateral dominance.
LLM interpretation
This figure consists of two brain diagrams, (a) for males and (b) for females, illustrating cortical dominance in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) region. Blue diamonds indicate channels with leftward or rightward dominance, while non-shaded diamonds represent bilateral dominance. Both groups show a distribution of dominant channels across the left and right hemispheres, with slight variations in the specific channels highlighted between males and females.
The spectrogram of ΔtHb of each channel from (a) male and (b) female groups. Color bar indicates the intensity of frequency. The range of frequency 0.01 to 0.08 Hz was used to assess the significantly different channel of PFC between male and female groups. The channels of PFC regions are Ch. 3 to 8; Ch. 13 to 19; Ch. 23 to 30; Ch. 34 to 40 and Ch. 45 to 50 of frequency 0.01 to 0.08 Hz were highlighted on the bottom of figure.
LLM interpretation
This figure presents spectrograms of $\Delta$tHb for male (a) and female (b) groups, with the y-axis representing channels (1–50) and the x-axis representing frequency (Hz). A color bar indicates intensity, showing higher concentrations of signal in the lower frequency range (0.01 to 0.08 Hz) across various channels. Each group includes a zoomed-in bottom panel highlighting specific PFC region channels within that 0.01 to 0.08 Hz frequency range.
The result of two-sample t-test from power spectrum of each channel of PFC between male and female groups. The Ch. 7, 8, 19, 29, 30, 38, and 39 marked with orange diamonds of left-side PFC and Ch. 13, 23, 34, and 45 marked with orange diamonds of right-side PFC are significantly different with p value < 0.001 between male and female groups.
LLM interpretation
This figure is a schematic diagram of a brain showing the distribution of electrode channels across the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Specific channels are highlighted in orange to indicate significant differences (p < 0.001) between male and female groups based on power spectrum analysis. The highlighted channels include 7, 8, 19, 29, 30, 38, and 39 in the left PFC, and 13, 23, 34, and 45 in the right PFC.
No entities extracted from this document yet.
No uploaded files.
| Citation | PMID | DOI | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| AndreanoJ. M.CahillL., “Sex influences on the neurobiology of learning and memory,” Learn. Mem.16(4), 248–266 (2009).10.1101/lm.91830919318467 | — | — | — |
| BirnR. M.DiamondJ. B.SmithM. A.BandettiniP. A., “Separating respiratory-variation-related fluctuations from neuronal-activity-related fluctuations in fMRI,” Neuroimage31(4), 1536–1548 (2006).10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.04816632379 | — | — | — |
| BoasG., “Noninvasive imaging of the brain,” Opt. Photonics News15, 52–55 (2004). | — | — | — |
| BullmoreE.SpornsO., “Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci.10(3), 186–198 (2009).10.1038/nrn257519190637 | — | — | — |
| BunceS. C.IzzetogluM.IzzetogluK.OnaralB.PourrezaeiK., “Functional near-infrared spectroscopy,” IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag.25(4), 54–62 (2006).10.1109/MEMB.2006.165778816898659 | — | — | — |
| ChuangC.-C.ChenC.-M.HsiehY.-S.LiuT.-C.SunC.-W., “Brain structure and spatial sensitivity profile assessing by near-infrared spectroscopy modeling based on 3D MRI data,” J. Biophotonics6(3), 267–274 (2013).10.1002/jbio.20120002522678984 | — | — | — |
| CordesD.HaughtonV. M.ArfanakisK.CarewJ. D.TurskiP. A.MoritzC. H.QuigleyM. A.MeyerandM. E., “Frequencies contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in “resting-state” data,” AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.22(7), 1326–1333 (2001).11498421PMC7975218 | — | — | — |
| CoyleS. M.WardT. E.MarkhamC. M., “Brain-computer interface using a simplified functional near-infrared spectroscopy system,” J. Neural Eng.4(3), 219–226 (2007).10.1088/1741-2560/4/3/00717873424 | — | — | — |
| FingelkurtsA. A.FingelkurtsA. A.KähkönenS., “Functional connectivity in the brain-is it an elusive concept?” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.28(8), 827–836 (2005).10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.10.00915642624 | — | — | — |
| FoxM. D.GreiciusM., “Clinical applications of resting state functional connectivity,” Front Syst. Neurosci.4, 19 (2010).2059295110.3389/fnsys.2010.00019PMC2893721 | — | — | — |
| FranssonP.SkiöldB.HorschS.NordellA.BlennowM.LagercrantzH.ÅdenU., “Resting-state networks in the infant brain,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.104(39), 15531–15536 (2007).10.1073/pnas.070438010417878310PMC2000516 | — | — | — |
| FristonK. J., “Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis,” Hum. Brain Mapp.2(1-2), 56–78 (1994).10.1002/hbm.460020107 | — | — | — |
| GlereanE.SalmiJ.LahnakoskiJ. M.JääskeläinenI. P.SamsM., “Functional magnetic resonance imaging phase synchronization as a measure of dynamic functional connectivity,” Brain Connect.2(2), 91–101 (2012).10.1089/brain.2011.006822559794PMC3624768 | — | — | — |
| GongG.HeY.EvansA. C., “Brain connectivity: Gender makes a difference,” Neuroscientist17(5), 575–591 (2011).10.1177/107385841038649221527724 | — | — | — |
| HorwitzB., “The elusive concept of brain connectivity,” Neuroimage19(2), 466–470 (2003).10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00112-512814595 | — | — | — |
| HoshiY., “Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: current status and future prospects,” J. Biomed. Opt.12(6), 062106 (2007).10.1117/1.280491118163809 | — | — | — |
| HoshiY.TamuraM., “Dynamic multichannel near-infrared optical imaging of human brain activity,” J. Appl. Physiol.75(4), 1842–1846 (1993).828264010.1152/jappl.1993.75.4.1842 | — | — | — |
| JaušovecN.JaušovecK., “Resting brain activity: Differences between genders,” Neuropsychologia48(13), 3918–3925 (2010).10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.02020875436 | — | — | — |
| KennanR. P.KimD.MakiA.KoizumiH.ConstableR. T., “Non-invasive assessment of language lateralization by transcranial near infrared optical topography and functional MRI,” Hum. Brain Mapp.16(3), 183–189 (2002).10.1002/hbm.1003912112772PMC6871823 | — | — | — |
| KochW.TeipelS.MuellerS.BuergerK.BokdeA. L. W.HampelH.CoatesU.ReiserM.MeindlT., “Effects of aging on default mode network activity in resting state fMRI: Does the method of analysis matter?” Neuroimage51(1), 280–287 (2010).10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.00820004726 | — | — | — |
| KocsisL.HermanP.EkeA., “The modified Beer-Lambert law revisited,” Phys. Med. Biol.51(5), N91–N98 (2006).10.1088/0031-9155/51/5/N0216481677 | — | — | — |
| KohP. H.GlaserD. E.FlandinG.KiebelS.ButterworthB.MakiA.DelpyD. T.ElwellC. E., “Functional optical signal analysis: a software tool for near-infrared spectroscopy data processing incorporating statistical parametric mapping,” J. Biomed. Opt.12(6), 064010 (2007).10.1117/1.280409218163826 | — | — | — |
| Lloyd-FoxS.PapademetriouM.DarboeM. K.EverdellN. L.WegmullerR.PrenticeA. M.MooreS. E.ElwellC. E., “Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to assess cognitive function in infants in rural Africa,” Sci. Rep.4, 4740 (2014).10.1038/srep0474024751935PMC5381189 | — | — | — |
| LuC. M.ZhangY. J.BiswalB. B.ZangY. F.PengD. L.ZhuC. Z., “Use of fNIRS to assess resting state functional connectivity,” J. Neurosci. Methods186(2), 242–249 (2010).10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.11.01019931310 | — | — | — |
| LundT. E.MadsenK. H.SidarosK.LuoW. L.NicholsT. E., “Non-white noise in fMRI: Does modelling have an impact?” Neuroimage29(1), 54–66 (2006).10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.00516099175 | — | — | — |
| MedvedevA. V., “Does the resting state connectivity have hemispheric asymmetry? A near-infrared spectroscopy study,” Neuroimage85(Pt 1), 400–407 (2014).10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.09223721726PMC3869394 | — | — | — |
| MesquitaR. C.FranceschiniM. A.BoasD. A., “Resting state functional connectivity of the whole head with near-infrared spectroscopy,” Biomed. Opt. Express1(1), 324–336 (2010).10.1364/BOE.1.00032421258470PMC3005169 | — | — | — |
| NiuH.HeY., “Resting-State Functional Brain Connectivity: Lessons from Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy,” Neuroscientist20(2), 173–188 (2014).10.1177/107385841350270724022325 | — | — | — |
| NiuH.WangJ.ZhaoT.ShuN.HeY., “Revealing topological organization of human brain functional networks with resting-state functional near infrared spectroscopy,” PLoS ONE7(9), e45771 (2012).10.1371/journal.pone.004577123029235PMC3454388 | — | — | — |
| OkamotoM.DanH.SakamotoK.TakeoK.ShimizuK.KohnoS.OdaI.IsobeS.SuzukiT.KohyamaK.DanI., “Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10-20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping,” Neuroimage21(1), 99–111 (2004).10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.02614741647 | — | — | — |
| RosazzaC.MinatiL., “Resting-state brain networks: literature review and clinical applications,” Neurol. Sci.32(5), 773–785 (2011).10.1007/s10072-011-0636-y21667095 | — | — | — |
| SasaiS.HomaeF.WatanabeH.SasakiA. T.TanabeH. C.SadatoN.TagaG., “A NIRS-fMRI study of resting state network,” Neuroimage63(1), 179–193 (2012).10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.01122713670 | — | — | — |
| SasaiS.HomaeF.WatanabeH.TagaG., “Frequency-specific functional connectivity in the brain during resting state revealed by NIRS,” Neuroimage56(1), 252–257 (2011).10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.07521211570 | — | — | — |
| ShimodaN.TakedaK.ImaiI.KanekoJ.KatoH., “Cerebral laterality differences in handedness: A mental rotation study with NIRS,” Neurosci. Lett.430(1), 43–47 (2008).10.1016/j.neulet.2007.10.01618023534 | — | — | — |
| SongX. W.DongZ. Y.LongX. Y.LiS. F.ZuoX. N.ZhuC. Z.HeY.YanC. G.ZangY. F., “REST: A Toolkit for resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data processing,” PLoS ONE6(9), e25031 (2011).10.1371/journal.pone.002503121949842PMC3176805 | — | — | — |
| TakedaK.GomiY.ImaiI.ShimodaN.HiwatariM.KatoH., “Shift of motor activation areas during recovery from hemiparesis after cerebral infarction: A longitudinal study with near-infrared spectroscopy,” Neurosci. Res.59(2), 136–144 (2007).10.1016/j.neures.2007.06.146617681629 | — | — | — |
| TianL.WangJ.YanC.HeY., “Hemisphere- and gender-related differences in small-world brain networks: A resting-state functional MRI study,” Neuroimage54(1), 191–202 (2011).10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.06620688177 | — | — | — |
| TomasiD.VolkowN. D., “Gender differences in brain functional connectivity density,” Hum. Brain Mapp.33(4), 849–860 (2012).10.1002/hbm.2125221425398PMC3250567 | — | — | — |
| TomasiD.VolkowN. D., “Laterality patterns of brain functional connectivity: gender effects,” Cereb. Cortex22(6), 1455–1462 (2012).10.1093/cercor/bhr23021878483PMC3450858 | — | — | — |
| TongY.HockeL. M.LicataS. C.FrederickB., “Low-frequency oscillations measured in the periphery with near-infrared spectroscopy are strongly correlated with blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging signals,” J. Biomed. Opt.17(10), 106004 (2012).10.1117/1.JBO.17.10.10600423224003PMC3461094 | — | — | — |
| van den HeuvelM. P.Hulshoff PolH. E., “Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity,” Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.20(8), 519–534 (2010).10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.00820471808 | — | — | — |
| WallentinM., “Putative sex differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: A critical review,” Brain Lang.108(3), 175–183 (2009).10.1016/j.bandl.2008.07.00118722007 | — | — | — |
| WatsonN. F.DodrillC.FarrellD.HolmesM. D.MillerJ. W., “Determination of language dominance with near-infrared spectroscopy: comparison with the intracarotid amobarbital procedure,” Seizure13(6), 399–402 (2004).10.1016/j.seizure.2003.09.00815276143 | — | — | — |
| WeissE. M.RaglandJ. D.BrensingerC. M.BilkerW. B.DeisenhammerE. A.DelazerM., “Sex differences in clustering and switching in verbal fluency tasks,” J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc.12(4), 502–509 (2006).10.1017/S135561770606065616981602 | — | — | — |
| WhiteB. R.SnyderA. Z.CohenA. L.PetersenS. E.RaichleM. E.SchlaggarB. L.CulverJ. P., “Resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain revealed with diffuse optical tomography,” Neuroimage47(1), 148–156 (2009).10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.05819344773PMC2699418 | — | — | — |
| YangH.LongX. Y.YangY.YanH.ZhuC. Z.ZhouX. P.ZangY. F.GongQ. Y., “Amplitude of low frequency fluctuation within visual areas revealed by resting-state functional MRI,” Neuroimage36(1), 144–152 (2007).10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.05417434757 | — | — | — |
| ZaidiZ. F., “Gender differences in human brain: A review,” Open Anat. J.2, 37–55 (2010).10.2174/1877609401002010037 | — | — | — |
| ZhangH.DuanL.ZhangY. J.LuC. M.LiuH.ZhuC. Z., “Test-retest assessment of independent component analysis-derived resting-state functional connectivity based on functional near-infrared spectroscopy,” Neuroimage55(2), 607–615 (2011).10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.00721146616 | — | — | — |
| ZhangH.ZhangY. J.LuC. M.MaS. Y.ZangY. F.ZhuC. Z., “Functional connectivity as revealed by independent component analysis of resting-state fNIRS measurements,” Neuroimage51(3), 1150–1161 (2010).10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.08020211741 | — | — | — |
| ZhangY. J.LuC. M.BiswalB. B.ZangY. F.PengD. L.ZhuC. Z., “Detecting resting-state functional connectivity in the language system using functional near-infrared spectroscopy,” J. Biomed. Opt.15(4), 047003 (2010).10.1117/1.346297320799834 | — | — | — |
In this knowledge base
| Title | Year | PMID |
|---|---|---|
| Reward processing deficits and impulsivity in high-risk offspring of alcoholics: A study of event-related potentials during a monetary gambling task. | 2015 | 26388585 |
External
| Title | Authors | Journal | Year | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genome-wide transcriptome profiling and development of age prediction models in the human brain. | Zarrella JA et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Sex based differences in functional connectivity during a working memory task: an fNIRS study. | Shirzadi S et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Characteristics of brain connectivity during verbal fluency test: Convolutional neural network for functional near-infrared spectroscopy analysis. | Wang LM et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Correction of global physiology in resting-state functional near-infrared spectroscopy. | Lanka P et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| The Effects of Mindfulness and Buddhist Meditation Coaching on Mental Health Outcomes in College Students. | Kim Y et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Narrowband Resting-State fNIRS Functional Connectivity in Autism Spectrum Disorder. | Sun W et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Commentary: Current Status and Issues Regarding Pre-processing of fNIRS Neuroimaging Data: An Investigation of Diverse Signal Filtering Methods Within a General Linear Model Framework. | Bizzego A et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Implementation of a six-around-one optical probe based on diffuse light spectroscopy for study of cerebral properties in a murine mouse model of autism spectrum disorder. | Kozhuhov A et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Obstacle Negotiation in Older Adults: Prefrontal Activation Interpreted Through Conceptual Models of Brain Aging. | Chatterjee SA et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Sex difference in the progression of manic symptoms during acute hospitalization: A prospective pilot study. | Abulseoud OA et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| The prefrontal cortex conscious and unconscious response to social/emotional facial expressions involve sex, hemispheric laterality, and selective activation of the central cardiac modulation. | Fogazzi DV et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Neural Efficiency of Human-Robotic Feedback Modalities Under Stress Differs With Gender. | Nuamah JK et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Hemodynamic effects of sex and handedness on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: the contradiction between neuroimaging and behavioural results. | Cinciute S et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Multifractal dynamics of resting-state functional connectivity in the prefrontal cortex. | Racz FS et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Resting-state functional connectivity in prefrontal cortex investigated by functional near-infrared spectroscopy: A longitudinal and cross-sectional study. | Wu S et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Resting-state functional connectivity measured by diffuse correlation spectroscopy. | Li J et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Increased prefrontal cortex connectivity during cognitive challenge assessed by fNIRS imaging. | Racz FS et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Mapping effective connectivity within cortical networks with diffuse optical tomography. | Hassanpour MS et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Deficient Event-Related Theta Oscillations in Individuals at Risk for Alcoholism: A Study of Reward Processing and Impulsivity Features. | Kamarajan C et al. | — | 2015 | → |
| Reward processing deficits and impulsivity in high-risk offspring of alcoholics: A study of event-related potentials during a monetary gambling task. | Kamarajan C et al. | — | 2015 | → |