Pioneering the Transdisciplinary Team Science Approach: Lessons Learned from National Cancer Institute Grantees.
paper
Cited
Public
- Authors
- Vogel, Amanda L; Stipelman, Brooke A; Hall, Kara L; Nebeling, Linda; Stokols, Daniel; Spruijt-Metz, Donna
- Year
- 2014
- Journal
- Journal of translational medicine & epidemiology
- PMID
- 25554748
- PMCID
- PMC4280018
The National Cancer Institute has been a leader in supporting transdisciplinary (TD) team science. From 2005-2010, the NCI supported Transdisciplinary Research on Energetic and Cancer I (TREC I), a center initiative fostering the TD integration of social, behavioral, and biological sciences to examine the relationships among obesity, nutrition, physical activity and cancer. In the final year of TREC I, we conducted qualitative in-depth-interviews with 31 participating investigators and trainees to learn more about their experiences with TD team science, including challenges, facilitating factors, strategies for success, and impacts. Five main challenges emerged: (1) limited published guidance for how to engage in TD team science, when TREC I was implemented; (2) conceptual and scientific challenges inherent to efforts to achieve TD integration; (3) discipline-based differences in values, terminology, methods, and work styles; (4) project management challenges involved in TD team science; and (5) traditional incentive and reward systems that do not recognize or reward TD team science. Four main facilitating factors and strategies for success emerged: (1) beneficial attitudes and beliefs about TD research and team science; (2) effective team processes; (3) brokering and bridge-building activities by individuals holding particular roles in a research center; and (4) funding initiative characteristics that support TD team science. Broad impacts of participating in TD team science in the context of TREC I included: (1) new positive attitudes about TD research and team science; (2) new boundary-crossing collaborations; (3) scientific advances related to research approaches, findings, and dissemination; (4) institutional culture change and resource creation in support of TD team science; and (5) career advancement. Funding agencies, academic institutions, and scholarly journals can help to foster TD team science through funding opportunities, institutional policies on extra-departmental and cross-school collaboration, promotion and tenure policies, and publishing opportunities for TD research.
No figures extracted from this document.
1–20 of 67
Next →
| Name | Type |
|---|---|
| academic institutions local | cohort |
| aerobic exercise local | phenotype |
| aerobic fitness local | phenotype |
| all-grantee meetings local | phenotype |
| Biostatistics Core local | cohort |
| body weight | phenotype |
| cancer | phenotype |
| career advancement local | phenotype |
| colorectal polyps local | phenotype |
| cross-center working groups local | phenotype |
| crosscenter working groups local | drug |
| crossdisciplinary research local | phenotype |
| cross-institutional collaboration local | phenotype |
| developmental pilot projects local | drug |
| developmental pilot projects local | phenotype |
| funded leadership opportunities for trainees local | phenotype |
| grant acquisition local | phenotype |
| Health disparities | phenotype |
| inflammation | phenotype |
| insulin resistance | phenotype |
| Interview Participants local | cohort |
| investigators local | cohort |
| keynote speaking opportunities local | phenotype |
| large-team collaboration local | phenotype |
| National Cancer Institute | cohort |
| National Institutes of Health | cohort |
| NCI-designated cancer centers local | cohort |
| NCI program staff local | cohort |
| NCI SciTS team local | cohort |
| nutrition | phenotype |
| obesity | phenotype |
| oxidative stress | phenotype |
| participants | cohort |
| physical activity | phenotype |
| poor sleep quality | phenotype |
| Principal Investigators local | cohort |
| research local | cohort |
| scientists | cohort |
| semiannual grantee meetings local | drug |
| senior leaders local | cohort |
| short sleep duration local | phenotype |
| sleep | phenotype |
| Sleep disturbance | phenotype |
| TD | phenotype |
| TD research local | phenotype |
| TD research collaborations local | phenotype |
| TD teams local | phenotype |
| TD team science local | cohort |
| TD team science local | phenotype |
| TD team science approach local | drug |
| team-based research challenges local | phenotype |
| tobacco use | phenotype |
| trainees local | cohort |
| TREC I local | cohort |
| TREC I Center local | cohort |
| TREC I centers local | cohort |
| TREC I Evaluation Working Group local | cohort |
| TREC I grantees local | cohort |
| TREC I participants local | cohort |
No uploaded files.
Not in any collection.
In this knowledge base
| Title | Year | PMID |
|---|---|---|
| Rethinking the Way We Do Research: The Benefits of Community-Engaged, Citizen Science Approaches and Nontraditional Collaborators. | 2017 | 29028120 |
External
| Title | Authors | Journal | Year | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applying theory to practice in a large research center: creating and implementing tools for building convergence capacity in individuals and teams. | Bourne K et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| A transdisciplinary dual degree curriculum yields novel and successful learning outcomes: early lessons from training physicianeers. | Wells GB et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| Considerations and recommendations for collaborative research networks in epidemiology: Lessons learned from the diabetes LEAD Network. | McAlexander TP et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| Procedural Physician-Scientists as Catalysts for Innovation in Team Science and Clinical Care. | Khan SA et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| Collaboration and growth in a large research cooperative: A network analytic approach. | Ducharme LJ et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Common criteria for evaluating cross-disciplinary research in global health: a scoping review. | Ding Y et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Metabolic Dysregulation and Cancer Risk Program (MeDOC): a transdisciplinary approach to obesity-associated cancers. | Lam TK et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Barriers and facilitators of conducting research with team science approach: a systematic review. | Ghamgosar A et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Bringing Together a Transdisciplinary Team to Create and Advance a Shared Vision for Research and Support for Siblings of Youth With Cancer. | Amaro CM et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Exploring team dynamics during the development of a multi-institutional cross-disciplinary translational team: Implications for potential best practices. | Kotarba JA et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Moving toward transdisciplinary approaches to addressing HIV and psychological trauma: Barriers and facilitators to building collaborations. | Goodrum NM et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Optimizing team science in an academic medical center: A qualitative examination of investigator perspectives. | Surratt HL et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Identifying actions to foster cross-disciplinary global health research: a mixed-methods qualitative case study of the IMPALA programme on lung health and tuberculosis in Africa. | Ding Y et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Interdisciplinary Collaborations in Digital Health Research: Mixed Methods Case Study. | Krause-Jüttler G et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Multi-, Inter-, and Transdisciplinarity within the Public Health Workforce: A Scoping Review to Assess Definitions and Applications of Concepts. | Sell K et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| An integrative review and practical guide to team development interventions for translational science teams: One size does not fit all. | Begerowski SR et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| A team science approach to discover novel targets for infantile spasms (IS). | CURE Infantile Spasms Consortium et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Conceptual models for implementing solution-oriented team science in large research consortia. | Thompson LC et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Scholastic synergy: A team prototype for pharmacy faculty engagement in education, research, and service. | Newsome AS et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Transdisciplinary research outcomes based on the Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer II initiative experience. | Hohl SD et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Using the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Building Block Approach to Implement System Evaluation Theory (SET). | Renger R et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| A critical realist synthesis of cross-disciplinary health policy and systems research: defining characteristic features, developing an evaluation framework and identifying challenges. | Dugle G et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Forging Forward Together: Transforming Scientific Practice to Accelerate Scientific Progress. | Hall KL | — | 2020 | → |
| Practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research: lessons from a narrative literature review. | Ding Y et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Proceedings from the Neurotherapeutics Symposium on Neurological Emergencies: Shaping the Future of Neurocritical Care. | Simpkins AN et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Towards Convergence: How to Do Transdisciplinary Environmental Health Disparities Research. | Cannon CEB | — | 2020 | → |
| Adding the Team into T1 Translational Research: A Case Study of Multidisciplinary Team Science in the Evaluation of Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer Risk and Prognosis. | Marrone MT et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Addressing Health Challenges of Women Across the Life Course: Summary of the Women's Health 2018 Preconference Symposium. | Schweinhart A et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Advancing Cancer Research in Africa Through Early-Career Awards: The BIG Cat Initiative. | Vogel AL et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| A framework for coordination center responsibilities and performance in a multi-site, transdisciplinary public health research initiative. | Hohl SD et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Measuring quality and outcomes of research collaborations: An integrative review. | Tigges BB et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Understanding the Value of International Research Networks: An Evaluation of the International Cancer Screening Network of the US National Cancer Institute. | Vogel AL et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Assessing Research Collaboration through Co-authorship Network Analysis. | Fagan J et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Building Cross-Disciplinary Research Collaborations. | Miller EC et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Collaborative Transdisciplinary Research in a Small Institution: Challenges and Opportunities. | Medina NG et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes, a Research Program of the National Institutes of Health. | Gillman MW et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| The ecology of multilevel intervention research. | Hall KL et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Three Metaphors to Aid Interdisciplinary Dialogue in Public Health. | Collyer TA | — | 2018 | → |
| Transdisciplinarity in Research: Perspectives of Early Career Faculty. | Moore M et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Rethinking the Way We Do Research: The Benefits of Community-Engaged, Citizen Science Approaches and Nontraditional Collaborators. | Dick DM | — | 2017 | → |
| Transdisciplinary approaches enhance the production of translational knowledge. | Ciesielski TH et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Regional Multiteam Systems in Cancer Care Delivery. | Noyes K et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Tackling NCD in LMIC: Achievements and Lessons Learned From the NHLBI-UnitedHealth Global Health Centers of Excellence Program. | Engelgau MM et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Transdisciplinary translational behavioral (TDTB) research: opportunities, barriers, and innovations. | Czajkowski SM et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Building new computational models to support health behavior change and maintenance: new opportunities in behavioral research. | Spruijt-Metz D et al. | — | 2015 | → |
| Building Successful Relationships in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial. | Marcus PM et al. | — | 2015 | → |
| Research Infrastructure for Collaborative Team Science: Challenges in Technology-Supported Workflows in and Across Laboratories, Institutions, and Geographies. | Mirel B et al. | — | 2015 | → |
| Team Science Approach to Developing Consensus on Research Good Practices for Practice-Based Research Networks: A Case Study. | Campbell-Voytal K et al. | — | 2015 | → |