Anterior cingulate cortex is necessary for adaptation of action plans.
- Authors
- Brockett, Adam T; Tennyson, Stephen S; deBettencourt, Coreylyn A; Gaye, Fatou; Roesch, Matthew R
- Year
- 2020
- Journal
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- PMID
- 32132213
- DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1919303117
- PMCID
- PMC7084129
Previous research has focused on the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) as a key brain region in the mitigation of the competition that arises from two simultaneously active signals. However, to date, no study has demonstrated that ACC is necessary for this form of behavioral flexibility, nor have any studies shown that ACC acts by modulating downstream brain regions such as the dorsal medial striatum (DMS) that encode action plans necessary for task completion. Here, we performed unilateral excitotoxic lesions of ACC while recording downstream from the ipsilateral hemisphere of DMS in rats, performing a variant of the STOP-signal task. We show that on STOP trials lesioned rats perform worse, in part due to the failure of timely directional action plans to emerge in the DMS, as well as the overrepresentation of the to-be-inhibited behavior. Collectively, our findings suggest that ACC is necessary for the mitigation of competing inputs and validates many of the existing theoretical predictions for the role of ACC in cognitive control.
Unilateral ACC lesions impair response selection. (A) Illustration of STOP-change task. Rats were required to nose-poke and remain in the port for 1,000 ms before one of two directional lights (left or right) were flashed for 100 ms. For 80% of the time, the cue light directs the rat toward the correct fluid well (GO trials). For 20% of the time, following port withdrawal (0 to 100 ms), the cue light opposite the first cue light turns on and remains on, instructing the rat to inhibit its response to the first cue light in favor of responding to the second cue light (STOP-change trials). (B) Illustration of GO (blue), STOP-change correct (red), and STOP-change error (dotted red) trials. (C, Left) Stereotaxic overlays detailing the extent of the lesion for all eight rats (four females, four males) tested. Lesions were primarily constrained to rodent Cg1 and showed little overlap with other frontal regions (35). (C, Middle) Photomicrograph of Nissl-stained tissue showing representative lesion (arrow). Overlay approximately matched to section (∼+1.6 mm anterior from bregma). (Scale bar, 1 mm.) (C, Top Right) Sagittal view of two injection sites in ACC and the targeted recording site in DMS. (C, Bottom Right) Overlays detailing the tracks of all 16 electrode tracks in the DMS. Shaded blue tracks signify lesioned animals, while black borders signify controls. Injections and electrodes were placed in either the right or the left hemisphere, and placement was counterbalanced across treatment groups. Note: placements are shown on the same hemisphere to reflect the unilateral nature of the manipulations. (D) Scatter plot showing the percentage of correct responses as a function of movement time. Black and blue dots indicate data from individual sessions for controls and lesions, respectively. (E) Percentage of correct scores on GO and STOP-change trials by condition averaged over recording sessions. (F) Percentage of correct scores based on sequence effects averaged over recording sessions. Lowercase letters indicate previous trial type; uppercase letters indicate current trial type (gS reads as “GO trial preceded a STOP-change trial”). A single asterisk (*) indicates significance at Bonferroni-adjusted P < 0.05.
Unilateral ACC lesions delay response selection in the DMS on STOP-change trials. (A) Illustration of trial types as they relate to movement into and away from a neuron’s response field for GO (blue) and STOP (red) trials as defined by firing in response to the first cue light. (B and E) Population histogram for control (B; n = 97) and lesioned (E; n = 53) rats aligned to port exit. Blue lines represent GO trials; red lines represent correct STOP-change trials. Thin lines represent movements away from a neuron’s response field (nonpreferred direction); thick lines represent movement into a neuron’s response field (preferred direction). Preferred direction was defined by the direction that elicited the strongest response averaged over correct trial types. Vertical dashed line represents the SCRT as computed by subtracting movement times on GO trials from STOP trials. (C and F) Directional indices (into − away/into + away) for firing related to the first cue-light epoch (first cue-light onset to port exit) in controls (C) and lesioned (F) rats. (D and G) Directional indices for firing related to the second cue-light epoch (second cue light to well entry) in controls (D) and lesioned (G) rats. A single asterisk (*) indicates significance at Wilcoxon P < 0.05.
Firing in DMS is overly active during errant responses after ACC lesions. (A) Illustration of behavioral responses on STOP-change correct (solid) and STOP-change error (dashed) trials. (B and C) Population histograms for control (B; n = 97) and lesion (C; n = 53) rats aligned to onset of the second cue light. Solid lines represent firing on STOP-change trials where the rat made the correct response, and dashed lines represent STOP-change trials where the rat committed an error. Thick and thin lines represent firing into (thick) or away from (thin) a neuron’s preferred direction. Tick marks (gray) represent significance when comparing thick to thin lines within trial type.
Unilateral ACC lesions disrupt STOP-change trial performance regardless of previous experience. (A and B) Illustrations of responding into and away from a neuron’s response field. (C and F) Population histograms comparing sequence effects in control (C; n = 89) and lesioned (F; n = 48) rats. Red lines represent gS trials, and orange lines represent sS trials. Thin lines represent movement away from the response field. Thick lines represent movement into the response field. The histogram is aligned to the first cue. Tick marks represent significance when comparing thick to thin lines within a trial type. (D and G) Population histograms comparing sequence effects between control (D) and lesioned (G) rats when aligned to port exit. (E and H) Population histograms comparing sequence effects between control (E) and lesioned (H) rats when aligned to the second cue. (I–L) Distributions of directional indices (into − away/into + away) during the second cue-light epoch (stop cue to well entry) for gS (I and J) and sS trials (K and L) for control (I and K) and lesioned (J and L) rats. The single asterisk (*) indicates significance at Wilcoxon P < 0.05.
No entities extracted from this document yet.
No uploaded files.
| Citation | PMID | DOI | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlexanderW. H., BrownJ. W., Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1338–1344 (2011).2192698210.1038/nn.2921PMC3183374 | — | — | — |
| BalasubramaniP. P., PesceM. C., HaydenB. Y., Activity in orbitofrontal neuronal ensembles reflects inhibitory control. Eur. J. Neurosci., 10.1111/ejn.14638 (2019).PMC821440231803972 | — | — | — |
| BotvinickM. M., BraverT. S., BarchD. M., CarterC. S., CohenJ. D., Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624–652 (2001).1148838010.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 | — | — | — |
| BotvinickM. M., CohenJ. D., The computational and neural basis of cognitive control: Charted territory and new frontiers. Cogn. Sci. 38, 1249–1285 (2014).2507947210.1111/cogs.12126 | — | — | — |
| BotvinickM. M., Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 7, 356–366 (2007).1818900910.3758/cabn.7.4.356 | — | — | — |
| BrockettA. T., RoeschM. R., Anterior cingulate cortex is necessary for adaptation of action plans. Digital Repository at the University of Maryland. 10.13016/lhzo-v5qc. Deposited 24 January 2020.PMC708412932132213 | — | — | — |
| BrownV. J., BowmanE. M., Rodent models of prefrontal cortical function. Trends Neurosci. 25, 340–343 (2002).1207975610.1016/s0166-2236(02)02164-1 | — | — | — |
| BrydenD. W., BurtonA. C., KashtelyanV., BarnettB. R., RoeschM. R., Response inhibition signals and miscoding of direction in dorsomedial striatum. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 6, 69 (2012).2297320610.3389/fnint.2012.00069PMC3435520 | — | — | — |
| BrydenD. W., Prenatal nicotine exposure impairs executive control signals in medial prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 41, 716–725 (2016).2618945110.1038/npp.2015.197PMC4707818 | — | — | — |
| BrydenD. W., RoeschM. R., Executive control signals in orbitofrontal cortex during response inhibition. J. Neurosci. 35, 3903–3914 (2015).2574051910.1523/JNEUROSCI.3587-14.2015PMC4348187 | — | — | — |
| BrydenD. W., Single neurons in anterior cingulate cortex signal the need to change action during performance of a stop-change task that induces response competition. Cereb. Cortex 29, 1020–1031 (2019).2941527410.1093/cercor/bhy008PMC6373672 | — | — | — |
| BuckleyM. J., Dissociable components of rule-guided behavior depend on distinct medial and prefrontal regions. Science 325, 52–58 (2009).1957438210.1126/science.1172377 | — | — | — |
| CarterC. S., Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280, 747–749 (1998).956395310.1126/science.280.5364.747 | — | — | — |
| CarterC. S., MintunM., CohenJ. D., Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: An H215O PET study of Stroop task performance. Neuroimage 2, 264–272 (1995).934361110.1006/nimg.1995.1034 | — | — | — |
| ChoiK., HollyE. N., DavatolhaghM. F., BeierK. T., FuccilloM. V., Integrated anatomical and physiological mapping of striatal afferent projections. Eur. J. Neurosci. 49, 623–636 (2019).2935983010.1111/ejn.13829PMC6056328 | — | — | — |
| EbitzR. B., HaydenB. Y., Dorsal anterior cingulate: A Rorschach test for cognitive neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1278–1279 (2016).2766998710.1038/nn.4387 | — | — | — |
| FellowsL. K., FarahM. J., Is anterior cingulate cortex necessary for cognitive control? Brain 128, 788–796 (2005).1570561310.1093/brain/awh405 | — | — | — |
| FouragnanE. F., The macaque anterior cingulate cortex translates counterfactual choice value into actual behavioral change. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 797–808 (2019).3098852510.1038/s41593-019-0375-6PMC7116825 | — | — | — |
| HeilbronnerS. R., Rodriguez-RomagueraJ., QuirkG. J., GroenewegenH. J., HaberS. N., Circuit-based corticostriatal homologies between rat and primate. Biol. Psychiatry 80, 509–521 (2016).2745003210.1016/j.biopsych.2016.05.012PMC5438202 | — | — | — |
| HolroydC. B., McClureS. M., Hierarchical control over effortful behavior by rodent medial frontal cortex: A computational model. Psychol. Rev. 122, 54–83 (2015).2543749110.1037/a0038339 | — | — | — |
| HolroydC. B., YeungN., Motivation of extended behaviors by anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16, 122–128 (2012).2222654310.1016/j.tics.2011.12.008 | — | — | — |
| KashtelyanV., TobiaS. C., BurtonA. C., BrydenD. W., RoeschM. R., Basolateral amygdala encodes upcoming errors but not response conflict. Eur. J. Neurosci. 35, 952–959 (2012).2235666010.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08022.xPMC3338123 | — | — | — |
| KennerleyS. W., WaltonM. E., BehrensT. E. J., BuckleyM. J., RushworthM. F. S., Optimal decision making and the anterior cingulate cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 940–947 (2006).1678336810.1038/nn1724 | — | — | — |
| KollingN., BehrensT. E. J., MarsR. B., RushworthM. F. S., Neural mechanisms of foraging. Science 336, 95–98 (2012).2249185410.1126/science.1216930PMC3440844 | — | — | — |
| KollingN., BehrensT., WittmannM. K., RushworthM., Multiple signals in anterior cingulate cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 37, 36–43 (2016).2677469310.1016/j.conb.2015.12.007PMC4863523 | — | — | — |
| KollingN., Value, search, persistence and model updating in anterior cingulate cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1280–1285 (2016).2766998810.1038/nn.4382PMC7116891 | — | — | — |
| LaubachM., AmaranteL. M., SwansonK., WhiteS. R., What, if anything, is rodent prefrontal cortex? eNeuro 5, ENEURO.0315-18.2018 (2018).10.1523/ENEURO.0315-18.2018PMC622058730406193 | — | — | — |
| National Research Council, Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, ed. 8, 2011). | — | — | — |
| NewmanL. A., CreerD. J., McGaughyJ. A., Cognitive control and the anterior cingulate cortex: How conflicting stimuli affect attentional control in the rat. J. Physiol. Paris 109, 95–103 (2015).2505148810.1016/j.jphysparis.2014.06.004PMC4298471 | — | — | — |
| NewmanL. A., McGaughyJ., Attentional effects of lesions to the anterior cingulate cortex: How prior reinforcement influences distractibility. Behav. Neurosci. 125, 360–371 (2011).2148069010.1037/a0023250PMC3109123 | — | — | — |
| PardoJ. V., PardoP. J., JanerK. W., RaichleM. E., The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 256–259 (1990).229658310.1073/pnas.87.1.256PMC53241 | — | — | — |
| ShenhavA., BotvinickM. M., CohenJ. D., The expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron 79, 217–240 (2013).2388993010.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007PMC3767969 | — | — | — |
| ShenhavA., CohenJ. D., BotvinickM. M., Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1286–1291 (2016).2766998910.1038/nn.4384 | — | — | — |
| ShenhavA., StracciaM. A., CohenJ. D., BotvinickM. M., Anterior cingulate engagement in a foraging context reflects choice difficulty, not foraging value. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1249–1254 (2014).2506485110.1038/nn.3771PMC4156480 | — | — | — |
| ShimaK., TanjiJ., Role for cingulate motor area cells in voluntary movement selection based on reward. Science 282, 1335–1338 (1998).981290110.1126/science.282.5392.1335 | — | — | — |
| StolyarovaA., Dissociable roles for anterior cingulate cortex and basolateral amygdala in decision confidence and learning under uncertainty. bioRxiv, 10.1101/655860 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-12725-1PMC679778031624264 | — | — | — |
| TennysonS. S., BrockettA. T., HriczN. W., BrydenD. W., RoeschM. R., Firing of putative dopamine neurons in ventral tegmental area is modulated by probability of success during performance of a stop-change task. eNeuro 5, ENEURO.0007-18.2018 (2018).10.1523/ENEURO.0007-18.2018PMC590918129687078 | — | — | — |
| VaidyaA. R., PujaraM. S., PetridesM., MurrayE. A., FellowsL. K., Lesion studies in contemporary neuroscience. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23, 653–671 (2019).3127967210.1016/j.tics.2019.05.009PMC6712987 | — | — | — |
| van HolsteinM., FlorescoS. B., Dissociable roles for the ventral and dorsal medial prefrontal cortex in cue-guided risk/reward decision making. Neuropsychopharmacology, 10.1038/s41386-019-0557-7 (2019).PMC702167731652433 | — | — | — |
| VassenaE., HolroydC. B., AlexanderW. H., Computational models of anterior cingulate cortex: At the crossroads between prediction and effort. Front. Neurosci. 11, 316 (2017).2863443810.3389/fnins.2017.00316PMC5459890 | — | — | — |
| VerbruggenF., A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task. eLife 8, e46323 (2019).3103343810.7554/eLife.46323PMC6533084 | — | — | — |
| VerbruggenF., LoganG. D., Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 418–424 (2008).1879934510.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005PMC2709177 | — | — | — |
| WiseS. P., Forward frontal fields: Phylogeny and fundamental function. Trends Neurosci. 31, 599–608 (2008).1883564910.1016/j.tins.2008.08.008PMC2587508 | — | — | — |
In this knowledge base
| Title | Year | PMID |
|---|---|---|
| Predicting Alcohol-Related Memory Problems in Older Adults: A Machine Learning Study with Multi-Domain Features. | 2023 | 37232664 |
External
| Title | Authors | Journal | Year | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in the anterior cingulate cortex predicts individual differences in motor impulsivity but not in risky decision-making. | Marchessaux F et al. | — | 2026 | → |
| The Tap-to-Safety Task: A Novel fMRI Paradigm Assessing Repetitive Threat-Neutralization. | Berg H et al. | — | 2026 | → |
| Cingulate cortex stimulation drives distinct pupillary responses in rat via recruitment of noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus. | Salvi V et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| Distinct connectivity patterns in clusters of inferior parietal cortex: from a cognitive control hub to modulating cortical areas. | Tabassi Mofrad F et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| GluR2 overexpression in ACC glutamatergic neurons alleviates cancer-induced bone pain in rats. | Ba F et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| Healthy aging in rats is associated with a decline in the ability to inhibit maladaptive responses, but not in measures of self-control by delayed gratification. | Brockett AT et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| Parietal cortex is recruited by frontal and cingulate areas to support action monitoring and updating during stopping. | Kang JU et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| The brain that understands different cultures: MRI-measured brain structure correlates with cultural intelligence. | Kokubun K et al. | — | 2025 | → |
| A mediation approach in resting-state connectivity between the medial prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate in mild cognitive impairment. | Huang YT et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Anterior cingulate cortex lesions impair multiple facets of task engagement not mediated by dorsomedial striatum neuron firing. | Vázquez D et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Anterior cingulate cortex projections to the dorsal medial striatum underlie insomnia associated with chronic pain. | Li YD et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Defining the <i>r</i> factor for post-trauma resilience and its neural predictors. | van Rooij SJH et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Distinct Action Signals by Subregions in the Nucleus Accumbens during STOP-Change Performance. | Ashton SE et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Dopaminergic lesions of the anterior cingulate cortex of rats increase vulnerability to salient distractors. | Clement MK et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Dopamine-Sensitive Anterior Cingulate Cortical Glucose-Monitoring Neurons as Potential Therapeutic Targets for Gustatory and Other Behavior Alterations. | Hormay E et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Coordinates Contextual Mental Imagery for Single-Beat Manipulation during Rhythmic Sensorimotor Synchronization. | Uemura M et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Enhanced Risky Choice in Male Rats Elicited by the Acute Pharmacological Stressor Yohimbine Involves Prefrontal Dopamine D1 Receptor Activation. | Münster A et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Neural underpinnings of fine motor skills under stress and anxiety: A review. | Martins LA et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Neurotensin-specific corticothalamic circuit regulates innate response conflict. | Park G et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Optogenetic Inhibition of Rat Anterior Cingulate Cortex Impairs the Ability to Initiate and Stay on Task. | Vázquez D et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Optogenetic Inhibition of the Orbitofrontal Cortex Disrupts Inhibitory Control during Stop-Change Performance in Male Rats. | Brockett AT et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| People with HIV exhibit spectrally distinct patterns of rhythmic cortical activity serving cognitive flexibility. | Landler KK et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Pramipexole restores behavioral inhibition in highly impulsive rats through a paradoxical modulation of frontostriatal networks. | Magnard R et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Reconfiguration of Behavioral Signals in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Based on Emotional State. | Lindsay AJ et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Success versus failure in cognitive control: Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing. | Cieslik EC et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| The Projection-Specific Noradrenergic Modulation of Perseverative Spatial Behavior in Adult Male Rats. | Kabanova A et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Transcranial direct current stimulation for patients with walking difficulties caused by cerebral small vessel disease: a randomized controlled study. | Xu Q et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Acute psilocybin enhances cognitive flexibility in rats. | Torrado Pacheco A et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Altered functional connectivity during performance feedback processing in multiple sclerosis. | Cagna CJ et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| A neurocognitive model of early onset persistent and desistant antisocial behavior in early adulthood. | van de Groep IH et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Differential processing of decision information in subregions of rodent medial prefrontal cortex. | Diehl GW et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Functional connectivity gradients of the cingulate cortex. | Shen Y et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Glutamatergic neurometabolite levels in the caudate are associated with the ability of rhythm production. | Honda S et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Hierarchical predictive coding in distributed pain circuits. | Chen ZS | — | 2023 | → |
| Inhibition of the dorsomedial striatal direct pathway is essential for the execution of action sequences. | Kono A et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Predicting Alcohol-Related Memory Problems in Older Adults: A Machine Learning Study with Multi-Domain Features. | Kamarajan C et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Sleep disorders causally affect the brain cortical structure: A Mendelian randomization study. | Gao X et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| The effect of creative expression program in neurocognitive networks performance measured by task and resting-state functional MRI. | Zhao J et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Training-induced circuit-specific excitatory synaptogenesis in mice is required for effort control. | Ulloa Severino FP et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Cingulate transcranial direct current stimulation in adults with HIV. | Jiang X et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Differential processing of decision information in subregions of rodent medial prefrontal cortex | Diehl GW et al. | — | 2022 | — |
| Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex activation disrupts Pavlovian incentive motivation. | Halbout B et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Emotional salience but not valence impacts anterior cingulate cortex conflict processing. | Duggirala SX et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Environmental enrichment leads to behavioral circadian shifts enhancing brain-wide functional connectivity between sensory cortices and eliciting increased hippocampal spiking. | Manno FAM et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Event-based control of autonomic and emotional states by the anterior cingulate cortex. | Seamans JK et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| First few seconds for flow: A comprehensive proposal of the neurobiology and neurodynamics of state onset. | Kotler S et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Highly unstable heterogeneous representations in VIP interneurons of the anterior cingulate cortex. | Johnson C et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Insula lesions reduce stimulus-driven control of behavior during odor-guided decision-making and autoshaping. | Pribut HJ et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Medial prefrontal cortex lesions disrupt prepotent action selection signals in dorsomedial striatum. | Brockett AT et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Multimodal gradient mapping of rodent hippocampus. | Gunnarsdóttir B et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Neural signals implicated in the processing of appetitive and aversive events in social and non-social contexts. | Vázquez D et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Rat Anterior Cingulate Cortex Continuously Signals Decision Variables in a Patch Foraging Task. | Kane GA et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Resisting aggression in social contexts: The influence of life-course persistent antisocial behavior on behavioral and neural responses to social feedback. | van de Groep IH et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Response Flexibility: The Role of the Lateral Habenula. | Hones VI et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Serotonergic modulation of effective connectivity in an associative relearning network during task and rest. | Reed MB et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| The mid-term effects of carotid endarterectomy on cognition and regional neural activity analyzed with the amplitude of low frequency fluctuations technique. | Porcu M et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Whole-brain studies of spontaneous behavior in head-fixed rats enabled by zero echo time MB-SWIFT fMRI. | Paasonen J et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| Anterior cingulate cortex and adaptive control of brain and behavior. | Brockett AT et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Hallucinations: A Functional Network Model of How Sensory Representations Become Selected for Conscious Awareness in Schizophrenia. | Hare SM | — | 2021 | → |
| Linking perception of bodily states and cognitive control: the role of interoception in impulsive behaviour. | Baiano C et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Perinatal Fentanyl Exposure Leads to Long-Lasting Impairments in Somatosensory Circuit Function and Behavior. | Alipio JB et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Prediction errors and valence: From single units to multidimensional encoding in the amygdala. | Brockett AT et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Reactive and Proactive Adaptation of Cognitive and Motor Neural Signals during Performance of a Stop-Change Task. | Brockett AT et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Amphetamine reduces reward encoding and stabilizes neural dynamics in rat anterior cingulate cortex. | Hashemnia S et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Anterior cingulate cortex is necessary for adaptation of action plans. | Brockett AT et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Anterior Cingulate Cortex Signals Attention in a Social Paradigm that Manipulates Reward and Shock. | Schneider KN et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Neural Signals in Red Nucleus during Reactive and Proactive Adjustments in Behavior. | Brockett AT et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Psychotherapy in pain management: New viewpoints and treatment targets based on a brain theory. | Moss RA | — | 2020 | → |