Genome-Wide Association Study of Behavioral Disinhibition in a Selected Adolescent Sample.
- Authors
- Derringer, Jaime; Corley, Robin P; Haberstick, Brett C; Young, Susan E; Demmitt, Brittany A; Howrigan, Daniel P; Kirkpatrick, Robert M; Iacono, William G; McGue, Matt; Keller, Matthew C; Brown, Sandra; Tapert, Susan; Hopfer, Christian J; Stallings, Michael C; Crowley, Thomas J; Rhee, Soo Hyun; Krauter, Ken; Hewitt, John K; McQueen, Matthew B
- Year
- 2015
- Journal
- Behavior genetics
- PMID
- 25637581
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10519-015-9705-y
- PMCID
- PMC4459903
Behavioral disinhibition (BD) is a quantitative measure designed to capture the heritable variation encompassing risky and impulsive behaviors. As a result, BD represents an ideal target for discovering genetic loci that predispose individuals to a wide range of antisocial behaviors and substance misuse that together represent a large cost to society as a whole. Published genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have examined specific phenotypes that fall under the umbrella of BD (e.g. alcohol dependence, conduct disorder); however no GWAS has specifically examined the overall BD construct. We conducted a GWAS of BD using a sample of 1,901 adolescents over-selected for characteristics that define high BD, such as substance and antisocial behavior problems, finding no individual locus that surpassed genome-wide significance. Although no single SNP was significantly associated with BD, restricted maximum likelihood analysis estimated that 49.3 % of the variance in BD within the Caucasian sub-sample was accounted for by the genotyped SNPs (p = 0.06). Gene-based tests identified seven genes associated with BD (p ≤ 2.0 × 10(-6)). Although the current study was unable to identify specific SNPs or pathways with replicable effects on BD, the substantial sample variance that could be explained by all genotyped SNPs suggests that larger studies could successfully identify common variants associated with BD.
Plot of −log10(p) from the CADD GWAS, arranged by chromosomal location. The top (dashed) horizontal line indicates genome-wide significance at p=5×10−8; the lower (solid) line marks p=5×10−5 (loci described in Table 1).
No entities extracted from this document yet.
No uploaded files.
In this knowledge base
External
| Title | Authors | Journal | Year | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developmental genetic effects on externalizing behavior and alcohol use: Examination across two longitudinal samples. | Elam KK et al. | — | 2024 | → |
| Polygenic Effects on Individual Rule Breaking, Peer Rule Breaking, and Alcohol Sips Across Early Adolescence in the ABCD Study. | Elam KK et al. | — | 2023 | → |
| Detection of Parent-of-Origin Effects for the Variants Associated With Behavioral Disinhibition in the MCTFR Data. | Kong YF et al. | — | 2022 | → |
| A statistical measure for the skewness of X chromosome inactivation for quantitative traits and its application to the MCTFR data. | Li BH et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Phenotypic and genetic markers of psychopathology in a population-based sample of older adults. | Gard AM et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Polygenic Risk for Aggression Predicts Adult Substance Use Disorder Diagnoses via Substance Use Offending in Emerging Adulthood and is Moderated by a Family-Centered Intervention. | Elam KK et al. | — | 2021 | → |
| Adolescent Externalizing Psychopathology and Its Prospective Relationship to Marijuana Use Development from Age 14 to 30: Replication Across Independent Longitudinal Twin Samples. | Zellers SM et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Heritability of overlapping impulsivity and compulsivity dimensional phenotypes. | Tiego J et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Predicting risk of suicidal ideation in youth using a multigene panel for impulsive aggression. | Koyama E et al. | — | 2020 | → |
| Conduct disorder. | Fairchild G et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Imputation of behavioral candidate gene repeat variants in 486,551 publicly-available UK Biobank individuals. | Border R et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| No Support for Historical Candidate Gene or Candidate Gene-by-Interaction Hypotheses for Major Depression Across Multiple Large Samples. | Border R et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| The Colorado Twin Registry: 2019 Update. | Corley RP et al. | — | 2019 | → |
| Cannabis use disorder and male sex predict medical cannabis card status in a sample of high risk adolescents. | Kim J et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Commentary on Border et al. (2018): The public health burden of conduct disorder, early mortality and criminal justice involvement. | Aalsma MC | — | 2018 | → |
| Impulsivity Dimensions and Risky Sex Behaviors in an At-Risk Young Adult Sample. | Curry I et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Positive expectancies mediate the association between sensation seeking and marijuana outcomes in at-risk young adults: A test of the acquired preparedness model. | Curry I et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Predictors of reduced smoking quantity among recovering alcohol dependent men in a smoking cessation trial. | Worley MJ et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| The utility of twins in developmental cognitive neuroscience research: How twins strengthen the ABCD research design. | Iacono WG et al. | — | 2018 | → |
| Examination of the Involvement of Cholinergic-Associated Genes in Nicotine Behaviors in European and African Americans. | Melroy-Greif WE et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Genetic influences on the human oral microbiome. | Demmitt BA et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Genome-Wide Association Studies of a Broad Spectrum of Antisocial Behavior. | Tielbeek JJ et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Predicting Cognitive Executive Functioning with Polygenic Risk Scores for Psychiatric Disorders. | Benca CE et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Unique and interactive effects of impulsivity facets on reckless driving and driving under the influence in a high-risk young adult sample. | Luk JW et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Using Patterns of Genetic Association to Elucidate Shared Genetic Etiologies Across Psychiatric Disorders. | Cho SB et al. | — | 2017 | → |
| Adolescents with substance use disorder and assent/consent: Empirical data on understanding biobank risks in genomic research. | Coors ME et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Commentary on Verweij et al. (2016): Conduct problems and substance use-genetic and environmental perspectives on sex differences. | Few LR et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Effect of adolescent substance use and antisocial behavior on the development of early adulthood depression. | Choi TK et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Evidence for Association Between Low Frequency Variants in CHRNA6/CHRNB3 and Antisocial Drug Dependence. | Kamens HM et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Meta-Analyses of Genome-Wide Association Data Hold New Promise for Addiction Genetics. | Agrawal A et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Risky driving and sexual behaviors as developmental outcomes of co-occurring substance use and antisocial behavior. | Luk JW et al. | — | 2016 | → |
| Test for association of common variants in GRM7 with alcohol consumption. | Melroy-Greif WE et al. | — | 2016 | → |